500 words essay on rainy day
beginning algebra with critical thinking 2nd edition
critical thinking flow sheet for nursing students
watson-glaser critical thinking skills test
case study of uti mutual fund
hand surgery personal statement
writing 5 paragraph essay rubric
cover letter for resume video editor
google in china case study ppt
sat essay yahoo answers
writing a research paper abstract
application letter sample for job vacancy
common app essay questions tips
essay potna heartbreaker download
writing lesson plans esl students
what tense should a business plan be in
essay on film taare zameen par
writing a good essay introduction paragraph
do you write lab reports in past tense
literature review writing for dummies
blank writing paper online
essay should we keep animals in zoos
cover letter for supply teachers
parts descriptive research paper
cover letter for cv for accountant
thesis proposal format harvard
butterfly essay for kids in hindi
ib computer science case study questions
argumentative essay outline abortion
case study seven eleven japan co answers
how to send cv and cover letter via email
best buy black friday essay contest
essay about overcoming obstacles in life
cover letter examples kindergarten teacher
process analysis essay rubric
phd research proposal sample for engineering
personal statement pharmacist band 6
essay writing workshop ideas
personal statement for a 16 year old
case study of job analysis in hrm
essay writing examples pmr
magazines hiring freelance writers
literature review sample research proposal
term paper child labor
expository essay title page
change career direction cover letter
critical thinking consider the verdict 5th edition
writing report card comments for esl students
buy e stamp paper online delhi
leaving job letter thank you
free sample of application letter for scholarship
critical thinking 5th edition pdf
essay title generator reddit
writing paper for kids with picture box
cover letter veterinary technician
grading rubric for nursing case study
application letter closing sentence
40 freelance writing markets paying 100 more
opinion essay examples pdf
custom paper placemats canada
executive summary project report example
cdc case study applied epidemiology
critical thinking in your daily life
deloitte intern cover letter
cashier personal statement resume
narrative essay topics ideas for college students
college essays that made a difference pdf
zappos case study developing a supply chain to deliver wow
literature review on multiple regression analysis
case study research design methods pdf
ap biology essay questions evolution
application letter for computer hardware technician
international politics essay topics
research papers in mechanical engineering free download
consumer behavior literature review pdf
sample cover letter for entry level receptionist job
example essay dialogue pmr
sample cover letter for qa lead
national junior honor society essay sample
case study zara supply chain management
essay type questions ppt
cover letter dear sir madam sample
free essay grader for teachers
cover letter without addressee name
essay topics about kite runner
research paper topics philosophy
creative writing exercises high school students
graduate school application follow up letter
creative writing schools in nj
request letter for job rotation
sample cover letter for resume housekeeping
writing topics for high school boys
essay on technology today
essays that worked columbia
writing a thesis paper high school
essay describing a beach
application letter block style tagalog
residential youth care worker cover letter
personal statement computer science cambridge
literature review on zooplankton
cover letter welding engineer
request letter for yearbook message
argumentative essay topics involving music
essay topics for ged writing
good persuasive essay topics high school
dissertations abstracts international online
letter for promotion and salary increment
contoh proposal tesis manajemen komunikasi
critical thinking self-assessment quiz
5 paragraph essay outline high school
cover letter documentation specialist
case studies in abnormal psychology 8th edition ebook
critical thinking scenarios for kids
quiz on parts of a research paper
contoh proposal tesis magister manajemen keuangan
academic writing for graduate students 3rd edition download
essay about my family in english
definition of literature review parahoo
cover letter accounting clerk position
application letter format for bank account transfer
essay writing topics marathi
essay examples elementary
short argumentative essay about abortion
goldman sachs cover letter advice
writing a paper in 12 hours
problem solution essay topics for college
cover letter name examples resume
easy english writing tips
uc personal statement margins
cover letter for non profit ceo position
application letter of waitress
assignment helpers in malaysia
application letter sample hospital
sample college lab report for chemistry
social work personal statement conclusion
case study six sigma at 3m
case study qualitative research method
essay topics for young people
kindergarten application essay examples
homework hawk level e unit 3
essay 300 words free
argumentative essay peer pressure
literature review training need analysis
sample essay topics for ielts
entry level nursing cover letter sample
critical thinking strategies for improving student learning
report writing format sample students
sample essay introduction myself
online sat essay scoring
the literature review six steps to success ebook
cover letter for teacher assistant position with no experience
spanish essay phrases university
letter thank you promotion
creative writing phd university of denver
essay writing topics with answers for bank po exams
easy argumentative research essay topics
letter of employment makeup artist
writing thesis acknowledgements phrases
paper plagiarism checker free
essay questions beowulf
group evaluation essay examples
essays beginning with quotes example
business english report writing example
practice exercises writing thesis statement
issa final exam essay answers
argumentative essay should animals be used for research
are electronic medical records a cure for healthcare case study
short essay on my body
literature review of vibration analysis
literature review of brand positioning.pdf
how to write a reference letter for college admission
audio video technician cover letter sample
phd research proposal sample uk
proposal letter sample for thesis
case study google sketchup
personal statement for veterinary school application
literature review apa example
health is wealth essay 200 words
music theory part writing checker
ptlls assignment 1.1 essay
technical report writing today 10th edition
casp literature review framework
creative writing minor requirements jmu
contract law exam questions essay examples
literature review outline for thesis
research paper topics 10th grade english
td bank teller cover letter
research essay structure example
body language essay topics
university of toronto writing centre literature review
case study unit 3 auric bank
sending cover letter by email or attachment
essay on corruption 250 words
essays on research proposals
writing a letter of recommendation for a student sample
essay scholarships 2014 for college students
how to write a speech for student council rep
how to write an research paper conclusion
personal statement samples ucla
case study house 22
job application letter samples pdf
literature review on chronic kidney disease
cover letter examples for sales coordinator
writing prompts for 5th grade
write essay describe your mother
critical thinking in psychology ruscio pdf
essay on 6 september defence day of pakistan in urdu
cover letter bursary application
free essay title generator
cv tips personal statement
essay about 3 wishes
cover letter for undergraduate nursing student
year 9 creative writing examples
case study solutions ppt
case study houses elizabeth smith.pdf
dental assistant cover letter no experience
case study 2 e-commerce for a small supermarket
cause and effect essay on school bullying
case study history psychology
essay on volleyball rules
how to write a speech for student council 4th grade
argumentative essay pdf
critical thinking in psychology separating sense from nonsense 2nd 06
sdn personal statement editing services
creative writing for 5th class
csu personal statement prompt 2012
stanford mba essays that worked
famous asian essay writers
essay writing pmr english
www.application letter writing.com
argumentative essay topics for grade 10
research papers on domestic violence against women in india
writing paper with school border
research paper template college
cover letter for management position with no management experience
higher english discursive essay topics 2013
how to write introduction essay persuasive
parts of application letter doc
essay on research methods used in psychology
essay edge wikipedia
argumentative essay on athletes as role models
case study accounting irregularities at xerox
admission essay interior design
creative writing queen university
literature review library management system
cover letter hospitality staff
razorfish case study interview
cover letter colleague referral
creative writing four genres in brief 2nd edition pdf
literature review assignment sheet
us history research paper topics 20th century
gcse geography coursework castleton
sdsu scholarship essay writing tips
jetblue airways case study solution
cover letter internship for accounting
informative essay thesis generator
essay describing a festival
letter thank you after internship
making a big difference case study 9 learning to talk
zespri case study harvard
book report format for 6th grade
creative writing prompt generator
mla citation zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance
essay topics hindi
essay writing my mother kids
essay on zoo for class 2
essay youth and money
which organization is the best for your essay development
case study job analysis hrm
write a essay on independence day
creative writing groups lichfield
kite runner example essays
critical thinking what it is and why it counts 2013
does music help you concentrate on homework
essay on college hostel life
annotated bibliography index cards
annotated bibliography maker mla
application letter project manager job
best american essays 2011 pdf
sample quantitative research proposal paper
opinion essay linkers
steps involved in research report writing
great cover letter closing lines
request letter bank change phone number
great cover letters law firms
my best friend essay for class 11
writing the perfect cover letter harvard
essayshark login
medical case study presentation powerpoint
literature review dyslexia research
literature review for facebook
academic essay conclusion examples
creative writing four genres in brief pdf
ibm case study interview gbs
essay nature my best friend
argumentative essay death penalty effective
kpmg case study interview questions
essay about defining love
academic freelance writing jobs uk
geography coursework data presentation

House Begins Markup of 2014 Budget with Add of Submarine

The House and Senate are in the process of considering the President’s 2014 budget request. As often different committees will review it and make changes sometimes based on their own priorities which means adding things or removing items from the original request. The budget has to go through two committees in each the House and Senate. Then it is voted on and a Conference Committee held. This means that often the final budget is not necessarily similar to what was submitted in February.

Not only do different companies lobby Congress for inclusion of their products and projects but sometimes the Services will indirectly. There exist lists of “unfunded priorities” and needs that Congress may address even though they are not part of the budget request.

The House Armed Services Committee as part of its review has reportedly increased the Navy’s buy of U.S.S. Virginia class attack submarines by 1 more then requested. The Navy had originally planned to buy two a year but in order to meet budget cut goals and reduce spending only 1 was asked for in 2014. The HASC has bumped that back up to 2.

Congress also wants the Navy to consider signing a multi-year contract for 10 submarines. Multi-year contracts are normally for five years and done for systems, especially aircraft, in steady state production. This allows efficiencies and better pricing due to stable quantities and funding. Virginia submarines are currently built by two companies – Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) in Virgina and General Dynamics (GD) Electric Boat in Connecticut and Rhode Island.

One of the problems that the Pentagon will face as it tries to cut money required to meet budget goals is that Congress is loathe to reduce programs. There are 435 House members and 100 Senators who see defense spending as a way to bring money and jobs into their districts. The idea of keeping one more submarine in the current budget will do so. It will also require the Navy to cut less money or take it from other budget priorities.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Joint Cargo Aircraft (JCA) Facing Uncertain Future

The C-27J Spartan is a twin engined light transport aircraft purchased for the U.S. Air Force from a team made up of L-3 Communications (LLL) and Alenia North America, part of the Italian defence and industrial group Finmeccanica. The C-27 is not only used by the U.S. but other countries across the world.

The C-27 was the result of a program originally called the Joint Cargo Aircraft (JCA) which was conceived by the Army as part of their plans caused by the decision to cancel the RH-66 Comanche helicopter in 2004. The Comanche was going to be a new attack and reconnaissance helicopter utilizing many new technologies to maximize its stealth and performance. In development for almost twenty years it finally had begun serious testing when it was cancelled. The money freed up was used to by systems like the UH-60M, the AH-64D Block III, CH-47F and UH-72A helicopters.

The Army suffered from a lack of internal heavy lift for intra-theater missions unlike the Marine Corps who possessed their own C-130 transports. The JCA was meant to add this capability and relieve the pressure on the rotary wing fleet primarily being used to carry cargo in Afghanistan and Iraq. Fixed wing assets would be more efficient and economical.

In 2007 the Army and Air Force selected the C-27 from L-3 and Alenia over bids by Raytheon (RTN), who had teamed with EADS North America, offering a Spanish made C-295 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) who proposed a C-130 version. An initial contract worth about $2 billion for 78 aircraft was awarded to the winners.

The JCA was made a joint program and it was originally planned to issue it to Army and Air Force National Guard units to operate. In 2010 the Obama administration decided to transfer the program wholly to the Air Force to manage and operate. The number of aircraft was potentially reduced and only the Air Force Guard would receive it.

The first unit stood up in 2011 in Ohio where four aircraft will be based at Mansfield. In 2013 the Connecticut and the North Dakota Guard are supposed to received the aircraft.

There are now concerns that the C-27 program may be on the chopping block due to budgetary pressures. The Connecticut unit may be the first to feel this pain although the 2012 budget as submitted does contain the funding for the aircraft it may not make it into the final budget.

The C-27 is not a priority for the Air Force and new equipment for the Guard also sometimes takes hits. If the Air Force leadership is forced to sacrifice some of their funding it may be the C-27 is what is given up. It is also a small program and is primarily oriented towards non-combat missions at this time further making it easier to give up.

As the budget goes through these machinations over the next few years other programs similar to the C-27 may be on the chopping block. That does not mean they will be eliminated but they could see cuts, delays and changes to their size, missions and deployment plans. These programs will have to rely on the Congressmen and Senators who represent the states where they are made or based to protect them through trading of priorities and support.

The size of the cuts the Defense Department must make dictate that whole programs whether in development of production will have to be cut. The C-27 might just be one of them.

Photo from Blyzz’s Flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Good and Bad News for Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII)

An F-35B Lightning II makes the first vertical landing on a flight deck at sea aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1).

Late last year after Northrop Grumman (NOC) separated their ship building components from the main corporation. Rather then selling these to another defense contractor they decided to set up a new company with its own stock. This was Huntington Ingalls Shipyard(HII). HII owns yards in Louisiana, Mississippi, and the Hampton Roads area of Virginia. It builds carriers, destroyers, and amphibious warships.

Northrop Grumman along with General Dynamics (GD) were the two major naval ship builders in the United States. They were concerned that the long term ship construction plans for the Navy were so limited in the future due to budgetary pressures and requirements that they decided it was better to get out of the business. The U.S. Navy currently really doesn’t have enough funds to build the number of ships in their plans. They also restructured their plans by limiting the new destroyer, DDG-1000, to only three and continuing production of the previous Arliegh Burke class.

HII has continued to received contracts from the Navy and deliver ships although it is planning a restructuring of its capabilities and workforce most importantly by closing their yard at Avondale, LA. In its last quarter the company reported a loss of $248 million but adjusting for a charge it actually had a profit of over $1 a share. This was better then analysts expectations and the stock went up quite a bit last week. The company increased its backlog and is predicting by 2013 that the financial should show much improvement as it works off contracts from the Northrop era.

At the same time though word came the Navy penalized the company several million dollars on a recent destroyer contract due to failures in its accounting and management system. The Department of Defense utilizes Earned Value Management System (EVMS) to help understand the cost and schedule of contracts. In this case the audit found deficiencies in 19 of 32 guidelines. The DoD qualifies company’s EVMS and if it fails then they can withhold funds or limit future contract awards until the system passes.

HII is in a situation where things like this are not helpful in the long run. It is not uncommon for EVMS to fail at times and the DoD and Lockheed Martin (LMT) had a long running argument over that company’s system a few years ago. Eventually they get resolved and work continues. It can just effect earnings and revenue in the short run.

The U.S. shipbuilding industry is in for a rough time in the next decade or so as the U.S. works out its budget issues. If the mandatory cuts do come into force there would be significant reduction in new ships which would affect GD and HII very negatively. While ships take several years to complete they need a steady stream of orders to maintain their entire workforce and to use them effectively. If there is a time when no new ship is on the horizon then there will be layoffs and contractions.

HII latest results were a positive but it may be hard in the future to continue to maintain the level of orders and revenue.

Photo from Official U.S. Navy Imagery’s Flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Turkey Buys Sikorsky

Foreign countries wanting to acquire United States weapon systems or technology have different avenues available to them. They may do a strait Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case where they contract through the U.S. Department of Defense with suppliers to provide the same or similar equipment that the U.S. is buying. Another option is to directly contract with a company to get a unique piece of equipment that in some cases has never been used by the U.S. military. Turkey has chosen this route with the announcement that they will buy over one hundred S-70 Black Hawk aircraft from Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (SAC). SAC is a subsidiary of United Technologies (UTX) and is based in Connecticut.

The S-70 is the commercial market version of the UH-60 Black Hawk aircraft which is the core medium lift system for the U.S. Army while also being used by the Navy, Air Force and other U.S. government agencies. The Black Hawk has also seen robust FMS sales across the globe including users like Australia, various Gulf States and most recently Sweden.

Turkey’s contract is initially valued at about $3.5 billion. Like many Turkish defense programs the aircraft will have substantial portions of it built in Turkey in this case by Tusas Aerospace Industries. This will allow rapid expansion of the contract if Turkey decides as well as an option for them to make the aircraft for foreign sales themselves. SAC will provide parts, assemblies and technical assistance to help the Turkish production and assembly facility.

The S-70 has seen some sales to other countries as well as U.S. agencies. The T-70 will be equipped with specific Turkish equipment and modifications most likely to include the radio suite, armament and other equipment. By doing it this way Turkey does not necessarily limit itself to equipment that has been used on the UH-60 and qualified by the American government. At the same time, though, they lose some of the efficiencies of the large U.S. production contract with SAC.

Italy’s Augusta Westland, part of Finnemechanica (FNC:MI) , was also bidding on this contract.

Photo form David Jackmason’s flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Dueling View on Defense Competition

Last week the former Reagan era U.S. Secretary of Defense John Lehman had an opinion piece in many newspapers across the country discussing the need for competition in large defense contracts. He specifically was writing in support of the dual engine track for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). This controversial program where a second source of engines for the advanced multi-role aircraft is being funded by Congress despite the objections of two Administrations, the Pentagon and the Air Force is being defended as risk reduction and as offering potential cost savings. This is how Lehman discusses it.

Certainly the idea is sound in that the second engine in development by General Electric (GE) and Rolls-Royce (RR:LSE) as an alternative to the main one being made by Pratt & Whitney, part of United Technologies (UTC), may end up costing less and be ready sooner but at a time when the program is struggling as well as the whole Federal budget it may be a luxury that the country cannot afford. Lehman cites previous examples of using alternate engines from when he was at the Defense Department that showed “benefits came swiftly and have endured. Reliability, performance and fuel economy improved steadily. Engine-caused accidents dropped. By the second year of full competition, the cost per engine had dropped 20 percent.” He points out that for the three major fighter programs of the Seventies and Eighties — the F-14, 15 and 16 — this approach was used successfully.

For both 2010 and 2011 the Obama defense budget request asked for no funding for the second engine. In the 2010 budget Congress found it by adding money and not taking it out of the core F-35 program. For 2011 the Senate has moved to try and not fund the program but the House markups so far continue it. If the final bills from each part of Congress contain differences it will have to be worked out in Conference. Obama has threatened to veto the bill if it contains the second engine but he did that last year and ended up accepting it. Obviously the Congressional delegations from the states where GE and Rolls-Royce are doing their work support it while the Connecticut delegation where P&W makes their engine have been trying to counter it.

In another view Congressman Tiahrt (R-KS) recently was interviewed about his efforts to promote the use of American contractors for programs. Tiahrt wants the Pentagon to maximize the use of American defense contractors even when it would have to lead to a sole source contract as there would only be one U.S. company able to do the work. The Pentagon does everything it can to avoid sole source contracts as that transfers most of the risk from the contractor to itself leaving little options of the program’s schedules and cost increases. Competition has long been one of the cornerstones of defense acquisition.

Tiahrt believes that the Defense Department must maximize the use of U.S. companies to provides jobs. At this time of current economic problems basically using the defense budget to provide “stimulus”. The problem this faces is that due to the decline of the U.S. industrial base in the Nineties there are often only one U.S. supplier for a product. Tiahrt uses the example of the buying of Russian Mil-17 helicopters for use in Afghanistan by the Afghan military rather then purchasing the UH-60 from Sikorsky, another part of United Technologies. The reasons given for the purchase are more driven by requirements and the needs of the Afghan environment and capability. This is a system they are familiar with, it is simple to maintain and matches well to the environment.

Tiahrt, a former Boeing (BA) employee, is also a big supporter of awarding the new KC-X aerial tanker to that company and preventing the European defense giant, EADS (EADS:P). He had criticized the previous award to Northrop Grumman (NOC) and EADS overturned on Boeing’s protest in 2008. Now that Boeing and EADS are in direct competition for the latest attempt to award this contract he has kept up the criticism.

The problem that the Pentagon faces is only Boeing and EADS have the capability to provide this aircraft. The last tanker that was purchased was the KC-10 in the Eighties made by McDonell Douglas, who are now part of Boeing. With those two companies merged there is no U.S. competitor for the KC-X. In the early part of this decade the U.S. Air Force did award Boeing a sole source lease for KC-767 tankers but this was overturned after Congress found collusion by Air Force and Boeing officials this decision launched the second contest won by Northrop and EADS in 2008.

Tiahrt is right in that the Defense Department should try to award to American companies but the number of those producing major systems has declined. The increase in spending since 9/11 has seen major market penetration by European companies mainly through acquisition of U.S. companies and the establishment of subsidiaries. This has been driven by the need for multiple sources for systems to help keep prices low.

Without a major investment in revitalizing the U.S. industrial base this will be the situation faced anytime a major contract comes up for award Congressman Tiahrt’s protests notwithstanding.

In order to meet Lehman’s desire for competition the U.S. has to allow foriegn bidders which is an unfortunate fact-of-life. Congress will need to face this unless they just want to give contracts to American companies which would counter their desire to do defense purchasing more efficiently and at less cost. The decline of the Nineties is the root cause of this situation and there is no easy short term answer.

KC-10 photo from Mr. T in DC’s flickr photostream.

F-35 photo from Rob Shenk’s flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

How Much Money Did Canceling the VH-71 Save?

Update — The Associated Press and other media corrected this report to say that it was an extension of a contract worth $8.4 million. The total contract value with the extension is over $8 billion. The point stands that there will be a cost associated with keeping the aging systems working while a new system is developed.

One of the programs that was ended as part of the Obama and Gate’s defense reforms was the new Presidential Transport helicopter. Lockheed Martin (LMT) and its Italian partner, Finmeccanica, had won the contract to build a new helicopter to ferry the President around replacing a fleet of venerable VH-3 and VH-60 aircraft made by Sikorsky (UTC). The program had faced cost and schedule issues due to massive requirements creep that caused the total cost to balloon. In 2009 the Navy pulled the plug on the program and started over.

Because a whole new program began it meant that the existing aircraft would need to extend their planned service lives. Some in Congress, especially Congressman Hinchey (D-NY), who represented the area where Lockheed Martin was doing the work on the program argued that this decision could end up being more expensive then continuing the existing program. Lockheed and Finmeccanica did offer a reduced cost program utilizing the aircraft already purchased that could meet some of the requirements but not all of them. One aspect that was raised that there would be a cost related to continuing the use of the older aircraft as they would need to be maintained and modified to stay in use.

Today the Defense Department announced that they were awarding Sikorsky a contract to carry out “VH-3D executive helicopter special progressive aircraft rework induction.” This means money to overhaul and update the current fleet of VH-3 aircraft. The estimated value of this contract is over $8 billion. This is money that is needed because the President’s aircraft must be maintained to the highest standard.

This does illustrate that in some ways Congressman Hinchey was right. The money saved by ending the VH-71 will now go to keeping the older aircraft flying and starting the new program. Eight billion dollars will buy you a great deal of helicopters and capability. Not neccessarily what you wanted in the VH-71 but certainly it would go a long way to meeting the needs of that program.

Penny wise and pound foolish as my Nana use to say.

Photo from sophiea’s flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Sikorsky and Workers Avoid Strike

Sikorsky and its unionized workers were able to agree on a contract today avoiding another potentially costly strike. The Journal Inquirer reports that the Teamsters Union and Sikorsky agreed to a contract on Sunday. Three years ago a long strike severely impacted the ability of the company to build aircraft at the desired rate of production. Since then Sikorsky has signed a big UH-60 Black Hawk contract as well as begun the CH-53K program and hopes to possibly win the CSAR-X re-competition. With all the work underway the new contract is substantially better in terms of pay then the last one. The strike was about employee contributions to health insurance although the union ended up settling on the company’s proposal.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

VH-71 Suffers Cost Breach and Connecticut is Lobbying

The Connecticut Post reports that the VH-71 new Presidential helicopter program suffered a “Nunn-McCurdy” cost breach. There are two levels of this breach and the higher one, a 25% increase, requires the Secretary of Defense to certify the program is still required for the U.S. national defense. The fine Senators and Congressmen from Connecticut have pricked up their ears at this development and want to meet with DoD to discuss canceling the program and giving it to Sikorsky. The contract with Lockheed Martin has seen considerable cost growth due to requirements creep since the contract was awarded. This has required wholesale changes to the EH-101 platform selected. Hence the great increase in cost and schedule for the program. Of course the DoD will have to weigh the savings if another vendor proposes something cheaper with the time required to restart the program. With a new administration it is conceivable that the contract could be canceled and started over, like ARH, but it probably won’t happen.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

U.S Navy Buys Eight More Submarines

The U.S Navy awarded General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman a contract worth over $14 billion to buy 8 more Virginia class attack submarines. Bloomberg.com has the report. The Virginia class are the latest attack submarines in the U.S Navy fleet. This order will bring the total to 18 either already delivered or under construction. The companies will split the order and build them at their respective yards in Connecticut and Virginia.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

GE wins contract to provide engines for the KC-45

This article, is I hope, commentary and not a news story. Or perhaps it is one of those commentaries that masquerade as a news story. Yes, P&W lost the chance to build engines, but GE won. If Boeing had won the contract I doubt there would have been an article saying “GE loses contract.” As to how politicians could change this, that I still haven’t figured out, since the whole source selection process is supposed to be removed from such things.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

>