Rapid loan com
Cashadvance cpm
Quickest cash advance
Short time loans
Easy bank loans
Dont be broke las vegas
Short term loans nashville tn
Empire loan augusta georgia
Bank of america get a small loan
100 dollar payroll advance
Loans deposited into checking account same day
Brighton financial payday loans
Get a 500 dollar loan with no credit
Petsonal lpans
500fastcas
Fast cash los angeles
Payday loans yakima wa
Loans in albuquerque nm
Installment loans based on your income
Cash advace for dad credit
Payday loans guarenteed
Online same day payday loan
Get cash advance with a 650 credit score
Loan with bad credit history texas
Best installment loans reviews
I have no credit history and i need a loan
Top ten quickest loans
Florida payday loan companies
Va internet payday loans
Legitimate lenders for people with bad credit
Can i get a loan to help me move
Direct loans by phone
Imapctcash com
Small line of credit bad credit
Places that give loans to people with no credit
Short term loans in pa bad credit
Small payday loans for 18 yr olds with bad credit
How can i get approed with poor credit
Cash advances in philadelphia pa
Signature loan direct deposit nofax
Online loans no credit check no fax
Tower loans ruston
Online installment loans missouri
Cashloan in lagrange ga
Loan byphone no donpayment
Money lending websites
Payday loans money same day
Money loans no checking account
900 online bad credit loan
Pay day loan no checking account
Cashnow loans
Personal loan old mutual
Florida no credit check financing
100 days of freedom loans
Loansbadcreditonline
24 hour loans online
1 online personal loans for bad credit
Lender to bad credit 1000
Pls loan store madison wi
Need 1000 dollars now
Shot term oans
Bad credit lease
Thousand dollar loan instantly
Www bad credit payday loans com
Verybadcreditloans
London kentucky payday loans
Private lenders in puyallup
I need 1000
Cash advance in san antonio
Money for low income people
Legitimate online loans no credit check
Quick easy online lenders
Payday loan in killeen texas
Www g loans com
Emergency cash bad credit
1000 loans today
Small loans santa fe nm
Rim and tire financing no credit check
Bad credit personal loan immediately
Automatic approval small loans
Pay day loans with low income
Loans up to 1000 secured
Payday loans plaistow nh
Cash loand
I need a fast payday loan
Loans money in minutes
Ace cssh loans
No credit check townhomes
Instant 300 loan
Call for a loan payday
Instant pay day loan
Apply for a cash advance
Where can i get a same day loan
What do i need for short term money loans
2000 installment loans
How to get 100 dollars fast
Need to borrow a 1000 dollars fast
California budget finance
America payday loan
Cash advance bakersfield ca
Quick guaranteed payday loans
Bakersfield loans
Www loans gov
Payday loans until taxes come
Guaranteed approval installment loand
Get a lone
Payday loans nj locations
Savannah ga yellow pages
I need a loan with a 495 credit score
Wisconsin payday loans
Payday loans with less than 10 percent interest
Payday cash advance naperville il
Reputable loan companies
Direct bad credit installments
No bank account loans
Instant payday loans no verification
Legit loan lenders
Check inadvance loans
One day money lending
Payday advance loans missoula mt
Online pay day lenders
One day payday loans
Ez money loan
Loans for cash with bad credit
Fundtimes payday
Online loan service
Get personal loan
Unsecured personal loans with no credit check
Find online loan applications from direct lenders
Loan for people on ssi
How can i get a personal loan online right now
Fastest place for a loan on the same day
Quick money loans now
Payday loans for unemployment direct lenders
Easy overnight approval loas
Instant no hassle payday loans
How to get approved for payday loans
Rapid loans direct com
5000 online loans
Direct lenders loans for no credit
Internet payday loans no fax
Installment loans alabama
Western sky loan
Loans tulsa ok
Online secure loans
Best online loan lender
Instant bad credit no credit check personal loans
Pay day loans albuqerque
No paperwork same day loans
60 second cash loans
Advance cash loan
Safeloan
Loans without teletrack
Payday cash 360 net
Payday loans near savage mn
Loans for people with bad credit in michigan
No tension loans that are legit and you esign
How many check stubs for a cash advance
Direct lenders for loans like ameriloan
Personal loann
Places to borrow money with bad credit
Payday loan naples florida
Www cashnet com
Very bad credit loan lenders same day approval
Pay day nation loan
Smart credit loan
24hr 1000 loan
Pay day loan portland oregon
Personal payday advance
Online repayment direct loans
Ez loan in nashville
Cash advance san antonio
Direct lenders alliance
Money advances in ca
How can i get a small loan with bad credit
Establish line of credit with capital one online
Tic toc pay day com
Tictactoccashadvance
I need of money now
No fax payday loans with out having direct deposit
Instantmone
Instantloansusa
Fast online loan
Pay day advance direct lenders
Applyy gor 1500 dollar loan
Fast cash loans no credit
Loansforpoorcreditonsocialsecurity
Sign up for free loan with bad credit
Instant approval payday loan
Easy qualifation loans in va
Payday loan no income verification
Bad or no credit instant approval loans
Easyloans
Where can i get a loan with low income
Cashfast com
247 esay approval for poor credit and bad credit loans
Guaranteed personal loans bad credit
Small loan up to 1000
Guaranteed poor credit personal loans nationwide
How to take out loans

Supreme Court Continues the A-12 Case Between Government, Boeing and GD

In the late 1980′s the U.S. Navy’s aircraft carriers were equipped with A-6 Intruder and A-7 Corsair II attack aircraft. The Navy wanted to design and build an advanced, stealth aircraft to replace these Vietnam era systems. This led to the A-12 Avenger program that would design and produce a similar aircraft to the U.S. Air Force’s F-117 stealth fighter. The Navy signed a contract with McDonnell Douglas, now part of Boeing (BA), and General Dynamics (GD).

The program though ran into cost and schedule issues and ultimately was cancelled in 1991 by then Defense Secretary Dick Cheney. When the Government terminates a contract it may end up owing the contractors money or be paid back for some of the cost. In this case the Government claimed that the two contractors owed due to non-performance while GD and McDonnell-Douglas claimed that they were owed for work done but not paid for yet because the contract was ended illegally.

Normally contracts are terminated for convenience which means the books are closed and settled and the contractors received some payment or they are terminated for cause in which case some money may be returned to the Treasury. The two companies claimed that because the contract was cancelled by the Defense Secretary rather then the Contracting Officer proper procedures were not followed. Both they and the Government sued each other. The case has been winding its way through the Federal Court system for almost twenty years.

Almost two years ago a Federal appeals court agreed with the Government that they were owed about $3 billion. The contractors then appealed to the Supreme Court and their case was heard. They claimed that the Government was hindering the case by using the “state secrets” privilege to keep key information from being heard by the courts in their defense. The Justice Department said that due to the stealth technology involved in the aircraft’s design and manufacture that it needed to be protected.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the contractors were right. They did not, though, rule in their favor but threw the case back to the appeals court for a re-hearing. The high court said clearly that the Navy could not receive the money while they used the “state secrets” rule to prevent the release of information.

This means that further hearings and trials may be ahead in this case. It is one of the longest running and largest contract disputes between contractors and the Defense Department and does not seem to be ending any time soon.

Photo from DaveReichert’s Flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Defense Department Reiterates Stand on C-17 Production

The C-17 transport has been in production now for almost twenty years and forms the backbone of the U.S. Air Force’s strategic lift. It replaced the Cold War era C-141 aircraft and has been built by Boeing (CA) at their plants in Long Beach, CA and St. Louis, MO. The Air Force actually possesses more C-17′s then originally planned because Congress has been adding them to the budget for the last few years. In 2010 the new Obama Administration did not request any further production of the system but Congress added them and the President did not follow through with a veto.

The 2011 defense budget also contained no C-17 procurement and this has been met with a better reception by Congress in general. There are still those Senators and Representatives from California, Missouri and Kansas who would like to see more aircraft built. They are certainly being used, but the Air Force and DoD argue that the money could be spent on more important parts of the defense budget. There are also concerns that when the Congress adds aircraft they do not necessarily fund the support which takes money out of the budget as well.

The Long Beach plant will close when production of the aircraft ends which would be a big blow to the local economy.

Despite Congress’ better attitude this year the Department must have some concerns as they released a strongly worded article yesterday detailing the reasons why no more aircraft are needed. This reads in part “..defense officials agreed with the subcommittee’s leaders, Sens. Thomas Carper and John McCain, that the C-17, in addition to the C-5, has been critical to airlift in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan. However, they said, the military’s current fleet of 223 C-17s and 111 C-5s is more than enough airlift capability for years to come.” It also contains a threat as last year that the President “.. has promised to veto any legislation that provides for more C-17s.”.

Does that mean there will be no more U.S. orders for the C-17? It might, and it might not. Congress is loathe to end programs like this that are not only successful, used and provide several hundred jobs across the U.S. Boeing certainly would like to keep the line going. The defense budget looks like it may make it to the floor of the Senate and House without C-17. That allows floor amendments and the conference committee to add the transports. If the Congressional leadership is disciplined it may end up without additions.

The other concern is how well Congress believes Obama will veto the bill over a few billion spent on the C-17. If they don’t think he will in the end as happened last year then the aircraft quantity may increase.

Photo from TMWolf Flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

WTO Report on Airbus Subsidies Roils Tanker Battle Further

Yesterday the formal report by the World Trade Organization (WTO) on their investigation of complaints by the U.S. Government and Boeing (BA) that EADS (EADS:P) and its subsidiary, Airbus, received illegal subsidies was released. The WTO did not support all aspects of the complaint but did say that launch aid provided by European governments to the airliner company was wrong. This launch aid was normally in the provision of low interest loans that were only paid back once the sale of the aircraft became profitable. The aid was considered illegal export subsidies.

U.S. politicians supportive of Boeing’s bid for the new KC-X aerial tanker for the Air Force seized on the report to aid their quest to have EADS bid either rejected or adjusted to reflect the addition of the illegal subsidies. The Pentagon has clearly stated several times in the past that as part of their source selection process they cannot and will not take into account the loans and other aid.

Congress recently passed legislation in the House that is an attempt to force the Defense Department to do that. The Senate needs to also vote on it and it will then move to a discussion of whether the DoD will follow that requirement.

The WTO said that without this aid the company would not have been in as good financial shape as it has been and could not afforded to develop some products — including the superjumbo airliner A380. The WTO may force the company to pay back some of the money, or allow the U.S. to impose tariffs on European goods.

The WTO did rule though that other aid the company received such as tax breaks or infrastructure support rose to the level of illegal subsidies. EADS and the European governments will appeal the case back to the WTO and are waiting to hear about their counter complaint. In this they are claiming that the money Boeing received from the U.S. military for Research & Development (R&D) amounts to illegal subsidies as well as it helped develop their commercial aircraft. That ruling may be announced before the end of the month.

The KC-X program is now on its third attempt to buy a new tanker to replace the aging KC-135 aircraft. The WTO ruling will make it easier for Boeing’s supporters to claim EADS is undercutting prices and causing the source selection process to be even more difficult. It also allows for a protest by either company if they lose and will motivate Congress to interfere even more.

The situation has been caused by the lack of aircraft manufacturers in the world. Really only Boeing and EADS may bid on the contract. With the demise of McDonnell Douglas in the Nineties there exists only one U.S. source. Awarding a sole source contract to Boeing will be difficult and the Air Force wants at least a modicum of competition.

Further delays seem inevitable.

Photo from Monica’s Dad’s flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Rolls-Royce To Build Engines For U.S. Training Aircraft

T45 goshawk engine contractThe U.S. Defense Department awarded a contract to Rolls-Royce to deliver F405-RR-401 jet engines. The $90 million contract will be to build the engines for the T-45 jet trainer as well as perform maintenance and logistics support for them. The bulk of the production will occur at Rolls-Royce’s Indiana facilities with support occurring wherever the Navy needs it.

The T-45 Goshawk is a modern, singled engine two seat trainer. Based on a BAE design it was originally manufactured by McDonnell Douglas in the United States before that company was acquired by Boeing. Over two hundred of the aircraft have been delivered to the Navy and they are able to conduct carrier landings and training.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/flyingsinger/ / CC BY 2.0
Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Aero India International Show Attracts Fighter Bidders

The six companies that submitted proposals for India’s new Medium Multi-role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) contract will all be in attendance at the Aero India International Show. The Economic Times reports that the competitors for the potential $10 billion contract will be at the show along with a host of other U.S. and European companies. Boeing, Lockheed, EADS, SAAB, Dassault and MiG all submitted proposals for the program. The theme of the show will be business activity between Indian and foreign companies. This contract is now one of the largest for tactical aircraft out for bid, and the companies will be touting their wares at the show.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

U.S Air Force Buys 15 C-17 Aircraft from Boeing

The BBC News reports that the U.S. Air Force awarded Boeing a contract to build 15 C-17 transport aircraft. The contract is worth almost $3 billion. The Air Force had been debating whether to buy any more C-17 but Congress provided the funds for these aircraft. The C-17 and C-5 fleet has been used a great deal supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The C-17 line was building some FMS aircraft for Qatar, UK and Canada but could see an end to production in the near future. This lot will continue the production for several more months.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Looks like Australia will go with the JSF

Australia had being going back and forth on wanting the F-22 instead of the JSF. China, I am sure, has a lot to do with this. According to this story, the decision has been made to go with the F-35. America has a law preventing the export of the F-22, but Australia had asked for it anyway. There was some desire from the USAF to sell it, as every FMS sale lowers the price and the Air Force would like some more. The only way that is going to happen is to get it cheaper. So it will have to be seen if any sales overseas are made. Certainly Australia and the UK would be the prime customers for the F-22.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Australia cuts bait

The Australian government decided after all to go ahead with the purchase of the F/A-18 to gap fill until the JSF is available. An article is here. The new more liberal government had discussed canceling the contract to save money. Now they claim they have been able to reduce the total cost, so it is worthwhile. See a previous article here. Read more

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Boeing continues to support KC-10 fleet while waiting on KC-X

The US Air Force gave Boeing a $307 m contract to continue logistics support for the most modern tankers in their fleet, the KC-10. See the St. Louis Business Journal here for more. Boeing and EADS continue to wait for the US Air Force to come to some decision on the KC-X program. If the Air Force had invested in more KC-10 aircraft in the 80′s, when there certainly was an ability to buy them, there would not be the issues today. The KC-X arose out of the ill-fated plan to lease KC-767 aircraft from Boeing in 2001-2002. This collapsed under ethical issues. Now six years later there is still not a replacement aircraft.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

McDonnell Douglas awarded Navy Harpoon contract

The US Navy awarded Boeing component McDonnell Douglas a $74 M contract for anti-ship missile Harpoon III development. See Forbes here for more information. The Harpoon is one of only two successful anti-ship systems developed in the west. The other being the French designed and produced Exocet. For more on the Harpoon system see this at Wikipedia.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

>