loans no credit checks no guarantor nz
honda lease deals with no money down
home equity loans in connecticut
private loan lenders in usa
long term loan guaranteed approval
property loan from lic
cimb personal loan interest 2014
cda loan program maryland
no interest car loan
nline loans
career development loans from banks
emergency cash loan manila
eb5 loan program
how do i get a cash advance on my credit card
lenders reverse closing services llc
through the taking of deposits and making loans banks
student loan lawyer portland oregon
payday loans washington mo
microcredit loan application
fifth third bank education loans
3 month loans for unemployed
how to get a home loan with little money down
get financing for a car with bad credit
how long does it take to be pre approved for a mortgage loan
money lending companies in india
how to get old loan agreement numbers
private home equity loans for bad credit
us fast cash payday loan
concord loans
rams home loan borrowing calculator
southern pacific loans address
rediff money home loan calculator
citi financial loans united states
disabled loans uk
money knowledge power
rent a center cash advance loans
australian central savings and loans online banking
service loans in jasper tx
advance cash personal
payday loans northern colorado
legal funding loans
catholic business loans
already have payday loan need another
quicken loans kansas city
mass effect 3 multiplayer quick money
loans for bad credit over 12 months
zemans jewelry and loan
is a simple interest auto loan good
find a cosigner for personal loan
getting a loan vs credit card
same day 12 month loan
get a loan guaranteed with bad credit
private loan laws
cash now 88
personal loan from private money lender
how to check credit file online
national student loan location
loand com
guarantor loans norwich
student loan nz ird
home loans for divorced mothers
cta teacher home loans
payday fast level
missouri loan center monett mo
why is it so hard to get a loan modification
fremont federal credit union student loans
how to make money with the stock market quickly
loans to non depository financial institutions
catholic university student loans
instant short term loans online south africa
forgiving educational loans
payday loans and check cashing store hilo
pay day loans no credit
home loans for challenged credit
loan logic albuquerque nm
fdic special mention loan definition
what is loans
education loan finance company
reviews for check into cash online
fast cash riverside ca
need a payday loan asap with bad credit
no job lenders
no credit check mobile homes mississippi
how to make quick and easy money on runescape
speedy cash payday advances
how to get fast money on runescape for non members
student loans acquired during marriage
lending money in islam
4000 cash advance
disabled veteran installment loan
how much do i qualify for a home loan
how long to pay back 5000 loan
kzst cash call
can i get a car loan from a credit union with no credit
african bank loan
african bank personal loan calculator
instant approval personal loans for bad credit
investing student loan money
motor club of america payday
online short term loans with no credit check
1099 for credit card cash back
where can i get a personal loan for 5000
how to get a 700 credit score in 90 days
payday advance loans how they work
hitachi loans complaints
where to cash check after hours
advanced learner dictionary online
great american title loans montgomery alabama
easy money online app
spring personal loans limited
one hour payday loans bad credit
usda nursing home loans
loan max bluefield va
getting a loan at money mart
how do i find a list of my student loans
how to get a bank loan with bad credit uk
quick and easy loans bad credit
emergency loans from banks
westpac home loans wa
red cross medical loans guildford
loan to deposit 100
highland loan source plano
credit fraud monitoring
balloon loans definition
lending test investment test service test
ebt emergency cash
can i borrow money from a chinese bank
50k personal line of credit
private payday loans
personal loans in yukon ok
payday loan greenville sc
quick and easy loan.com
personal loan no bank account required
car loans in chicago il
last day to pay taxes in usa
car title loans portsmouth nh
capital one car loan
loan store aurora il
list of savings and loans banks
how to get help for depression with no money
how to get money fast in webkinz
cheques for credit cards
home loan qualifications guidelines
12 months loan uk
loans held for sale mark to market
punjab national bank cash deposit slip
how to get easy money in bioshock 2
home loan lic vs axis
beneficial loan payment of interest
how do you get a loan in simcity deluxe
christian pay day loans
no upfront fee hard money loans
professional finance services greeley colorado
i need cash now commercial bus
personal loan from multiple banks
finance online journals
personal loan companies in newnan ga
the loved ones mthai 26
get paid last working day month
loan writer jobs sydney
online payday loans ca
bad credit loans for employed
harp loan requirements wells fargo
i need a payday loan in nc
credit loan approval
term loan project report
mortgage loan denial form
how can i get a loan in an hour
i pay my bills
cash advance on ms credit card
secured loan debt consolidation
transaction type atm cash advances or bank transaction
hot topic hot cash no receipt
credit union loans calculator drogheda
university of phoenix loan defaults
where can i get a mortgage loan with bad credit
appeal budgeting loan decision
hardship loan bad credit
help with plain green loan
career that makes a lot of money thats easy
pnc unsecured loan application
magnum cash adv credit
samsung galaxy s advance price in malaysia now
loans with bad credit denver
bad credit online loans in south africa
maybank loan repayment table
undergraduate education loans
short term loan to improve credit
life insurance cash back deals
easy ways to get money uk
how to find your total amount of student loans
commonwealth bank home loan deposit percentage
hard money loans tucson az
quick money to paypal
pay credit card bills using credit card
money lenders limerick
payday loan glendora ca
free legal advice on loans
acs deaf loan
cash with us rapid city sd
legit car loans for bad credit
student loans and home financing
business cash advance lenders
your loan faster
can i get a payday loan with a cash card
arkansas cash fast loan
title loans in waynesboro pa
cash personal cheques uk
how to get out of a cash advance loan
ez payday advance manhattan ks
govt of orissa finance department festival advance
credit cards for fair credit instant approval
todayloan com
cheapest personal loans calculator
sample letter of advance money
24 loans repayment
reviews for loan up
personal loans colorado springs bad credit
space coast loans
great american cash advance meridian ms
auto loan from golden 1
farm loans pa
lone star title loan in dallas tx
how to make 8000 dollars fast
bpi direct personal loan
farm loans ks
bad credit loans monthly payments
send money online using credit card western union
need payday loan leads
bond loans housing nsw
apply for grad plus loan online
cash fast title loans fort mill sc
3000 loan with bad credit canada
cash loan with no employment verification
best secured loans
car loans interest rate malaysia
direct loan account management
advance paycheck.com
gold loan providers in pune
payday advance tucson
ge personal loan singapore
payday loans antioch ca
welcome finance slough
dollar loan center headquarters
ut austin loans
quick cash loans caldwell idaho
easy way to make money in runescape 2014
personal loans you pay back monthly
loans march 31
cash advance for discover card
car credit guaranteed
new payday lenders uk no credit check
immedate payday loans no depoust
paydayuk faster payments
better than payday loan
maine short term loans
auto loan rates madison wi
chase manhattan home loans
i need a 400 loan
payday loans coolidge az
financing with ford
lic education loans
yayasan pahang study loan
get a personal loan with bad credit canada
payday loan locations houston
al rajhi bank personal loan requirement
kcb personal loan application form
where to cash checks in el paso
bad credit personal loans for 10000
state texas student loan 4
paycheck advance sun valley nevada
how to get easy money from the government
medical debt consolidation loans
no interest home loan
payday loan cash loan
loan with bad credit no fee
installment loan laws in wisconsin
30 month loan calculator
get my credit score online
bad credit and need a personal loan
cash fast northglenn
juvenile cash money net worth
payday loans in yucaipa
no credit check payday loans jackson ms
e loan israel
small business loans in orlando
easy loans nz bad credit
get approved for cash loan instantly
bad credit car loan albany ny
payday two gamestop
bank america personal loan qualifications
how long will harp loans be available
easy ways to make money with your pc
45000 loan bad credit
personal loan places in greenville nc
500 quick cash
arkansas bond loan
edinburgh council business loans
3000 unsecured loan
car loans calculator payments

Canada to Look at Other Aircraft for F-35 Mission

After considering the independent auditor’s report submitted to the Ministry of Public Works earlier this year the Conservative government of Canada announced yesterday that they would now look at other aircraft rather then the F-35 to meet the CF-18 replacement requirement. The major reason cited was the much higher estimate of the lifetime cost to procure and operate the advanced aircraft.

The new estimate is almost $46 billion over a projected 42 years. The estimate used to justify the sole source contract for the F-35 was $25 billion for 20 years of operations. The auditor also estimated that due to the cost increases in the F-35 that with the current available funding only 55 aircraft could be bought and not 65.

Canada will now establish a new group to look at aircraft. These could include Boeing (BA) F/A-18 fighters, Eurofighter Typhoons and Dassault Rafale aircraft. The loss of the Canadian buy while a small part of the total planned quantity of over 2,000 F-35 would be a blow to the program and Lockheed Martin (LMT).

The increases in unit cost of the aircraft along with the delays in schedule have caused other partners to reconsider. The Netherlands has also looked at the program’s cost growth over the years as a reason to reconsider. It would allow less aircraft to be purchased to replace their aging F-16 fighters. There is also a requirement to continue using the older aircraft longer then originally planned with associated costs.

Canada could in the end still choose the F-35 but the fact that they are conducting the review is a negative for the overall program.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

KC-46A Costs Reportedly Increase

A few weeks ago it was reported that Boeing (BA) had already informed the U.S. Air Force of at least a $300 million increase in the costs of the first phase of the KC-46A aerial tanker program. This led to Reuters asking the Air Force some follow up questions on the situation.

They are now reporting that the way the current contract is structured the Government and Boeing would share in the first $1 billion increase beyond the target price of $3.9 billion for the EMD contract which will also deliver 18 tankers. The original contract value was about $3.6 billion.

Once the price gets beyond $4.9 billion Boeing would be responsible for all costs. Up to that they would pay 40% and the government 60 or $600 million. The reports last month had Boeing predicting that they would spend at least $4.2 billion.

This was the third attempt by the Air Force to award the new tanker contract since 2001. An attempt to award a sole source lease to Boeing was derailed by fraudulent activity by Air Force acquisition chief Darleen Druyun and Boeing’s CFO. In 2008 EADS teamed with Northrop Grumman (NOC) won a contest that was overturned on protest by Boeing. This latest contract is the result of the new competition held due to Boeing’s successful protest. EADS was not able to match the price that Boeing offered which is now seemingly controversial due to the reported cost increases.

HP Scores Big with Navy Network Transfer and Management Contract

The United States Defense Department is a large, complex organization that employs a lot of people and spends a great deal of money. It has two primary functions: to prepare the Armed Services for fighting and to fight. This means that it buys a lot of things that a traditional company would although this sometimes surprises people.

Hewlett Packard (HP) recently was awarded a “Continuity of Services Contract (CoSC) by the U.S. Navy to provide IT enterprise services. This means that rather then conduct a new competition to find a supplier the Navy was able to sole source the deal by just continuing the existing contract with HP. The Navy must be happy with the level of support that HP is providing and felt justified in not going through a competitive round to maintain these services. One major argument for this move is that the Navy is in the process of transferring to a new network, the Next Generation Enterprise Network (NGEN), and this contract action allows that work continue without any delay due to transferring the work to another contract.

Like any large organization the Navy and other parts of DoD need good networks that allow reliable transfer of data and communications. They may have a few more security requirements that include both physical and network but the general work is no different then others.

One difference is the size of the deal. The initial piece of this new contract is only for about $30 million the total contract could be worth up to $3 billion. Any deal like that is nothing for a company to sneeze at and the work is certainly welcome in this time of struggling economy.

Photo from skuds flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Federal Government Continues Moves to Restrict Native American Contracts and Companies

The Federal Government has a program called “Section 8(a)” that is used to favor small businesses. This rule allows the award of sole source contracts to companies meeting certain requirements. The idea is to grow small businesses through this simpler award process and also aid disadvantage groups. The 8(a) rules favor those contractors owned by women, minorities and service disabled veterans. The restriction on the program is that the size of the contract is limited to under $20 million since the goal is jump start small companies into larger ones.

One of the legacies of Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) was a rule that Alaskan Native American companies could win a contract of any size. He had this change made in the defense bills. This has allowed those corporations to grow and win contracts over not only other 8a companies but also traditional contractors as well. This rule had raised the hackles of other Senators and in the last few years there has been movement to eliminate the rule favoring Alaskan companies.

Not only that but one of the reforms that the Obama Administration is trying to accomplish is the reduction in the number of sole source contracts awarded. The goal with that reform is to gain more competition, better pricing and ultimately save money. The use of sole source contracts makes an award process simpler and easier for the contracting command involved as it shortens the time line since there needs to be no competition. There use is often justified to gain speedy awards. These changes are putting pressure on all Native American owned companies but especially Alaskan ones who may see a significant decline in their work if the government does limit awards and increase competition.

The most recent Defense Authorization Bill included a limit of sole source contracts to $20 million dollars without requiring extended approval and justification. This change will make it harder to award these contracts quickly which may lead to more competitions among non-8(a) companies. The Defense Department is meeting with Native American groups to discuss these changes and their affects.

The government is also facing problems because of a recent court case that ruled that HUBZone companies take precedence over other small businesses. Since few Native American corporations are in Historically Underutilized Business Zones which are normally in large urban areas this ruing will also limit their chances of getting sole source awards. This means that Native American companies may have to compete for these contracts as if a HUBZone company wants the business and it is decided to sole source it they must get it.

The government has in the past justified these contracts as a way to help disadvantaged groups at the cost of a small amount of inefficiency and the chance of slightly higher prices. The current deficit situation and the desire to increase efficiency as well as Steven’s exemption of his home state businesses have led to a reevaluation of these processes. The end result may be a significant decrease in the amount of work these companies now get from the government or increased costs for them as they must bid on contracts. Either result limits the effect of the Federal spending on their communities which was the whole point of the program in the first place.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Alabama Senator Sessions Responds To Congressman Dicks

Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) issued a press release today criticizing Washington Congressman Norm Dicks (D-WA) for his comments basically telling EADS (EADS:P) not to attempt to bid on the KC-X contract.

In the release Sessions makes clear his desire for competition in the tanker contract while continuing to support EADS who have proposed assembling the Airbus 330 aircraft in Mobile, AL. Sessions writes: “Defense companies should understand that, contrary to Representative Dick’s comments, the majority of members in the House and Senate want a robust competition engineered not to benefit a single company, but to produce the best airplane for the war fighter.”

In Sessions view having EADS submit a bid along with Boeing (BA) will only strengthen the program. The award of what will amount to a sole-source contract to Boeing if EADS or another company does not bid will be a difficult process for the Air Force leaving many different avenues for criticism. This is especially true if Boeing has their struggles down the road.

No-bid Contract Delivers Bad News to Postal Service

March 24, 2010 by · Comment
Filed under: BNET 

The U.S. Postal Service decision to award a sole source contract to a company for website development is raising eyebrows. The official making the…

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Reports of Other Bidders for KC-X Emerge?

Over the weekend it was reported that the Russian state owned aircraft company, United Aircraft, might be interested in bidding on the KC-X proposal. With Northrop now planning on not participating with EADS only Boeing was left as a confirmed bidder. Russia was about the only other country that had the capability to submit a proposal as they have already made tankers for themselves, India and other users. The thought though of Il-76 based tankers fueling F-22 is sort of hard to imagine. Documents provided to the Seattle Times show that United Aircraft would team with a World Aviation Maintenance to form a new company to bid. The proposal would be based on the Il-96 airliner rather then the older transport tanker already in service.

At the same time there are reports that EADS may submit a bid with themselves as the prime. Earlier this month the company said that it was not confident of being able to do this. EADS-North America could certainly be used as a prime contractor. The time needed for the company to prepare a proposal of this magnitude is why there is talk of extending the deadline three months.

It would be good for the U.S. Defense Department and Air Force to have some form of competition in the latest attempt to award this contract. Whether the Russian or EADS based bids would be viable is another matter. It is going to be difficult though to award what amounts to a sole-source contract with the mood in Congress of many Northrop and EADS supporters.

Now Reports That EADS May Bid After All

There is a rumor that the Pentagon may delay the deadline for submission of a proposal for the KC-X to accommodate either a solo bid or another partnership. This contradicts what was reported yesterday that EADS-NA CEO Sean O’Keefe said the company wouldn’t bid without Northrop Grumman (NOC). It will be seriously difficult for the company to bid by itself. It would need to find another U.S. company to work with.

This might be second thoughts by DoD as they realize how difficult doing a single bid contract award will be. This is not a sole source contract but right now it would only receive one qualified offer.

Split Buy Again?

One of the solutions that has been mooted to solve the KC-X issue is to buy aircraft from both Boeing (BA) and EADS (EADS.P). This would certainly eliminate many of the issues around the source selection. The Defense Department and Air Force have not supported this idea in the past due to the logistical costs related to operating two dissimilar aircraft. Of course the problem the Air Force faces is that the KC-30 and KC-767 are too dissimilar.

Some in Congress and in the industry suggested the split buy last Summer and now it has been raised again. If Northrop Grumman (NOC) does refuse to submit a bid then the contest is on hold unless there is the will to do a sole source contract again. The split buy would solve that issue and keep Northrop playing.

We will have to see how this plays out.

Northrop Congressional Supporters Continue Harsh Words

Last week Northrop Grumman (NOC) and its partner EADS (EADS.P) wrote a letter to the Defense Department stating that they are not interested in bidding on the KC-X contract if the current RFP language stands. Their argument is that it is currently biased towards a smaller aircraft which means that it is set up to give Boeing the contract. In their eyes there is no reason to go through the motion of bidding just not to win.

This of course caused all sorts of critics to rise up and claim that Northrop was trying to force the Government to bias the RFP and contract towards Northrop. Basically this is an attempt to blackmail the Government. The problem the Air Force has faced is that they need to write a RFP that gets them the best value bid meeting all of its requirements and is done in such a way that no protest occurs. This is proving difficult to do. The two aircraft, KC-767 or A330, are dissimilar enough that the requirements have to be carefully chosen. At the same time there is a great deal of pressure in Congress to support American companies and products. This is the state that the U.S. has gotten itself into by allowing only one major source of aircraft of this size to remain — Boeing (BA).

Now Northrop’s supporters in Congress are striking back. In a recent editorial the Congressman for Mobile, AL where EADS will assemble the aircraft, Jo Bonner (R-AL), writes that it is unfair to tar Northrop. In his eyes the Government is going out of their way to award a sole source contract to Boeing. This violates the spirit if not the law on contracting. He writes “And the reason Northrop Grumman, and its partner EADS, was not playing a game of chicken is because the draft RFP, released by the Air Force in September, has been all but written to guarantee the pre-selection of the smaller, older and much less capable Boeing 767″.

That is the crux of the problem. The Government lost the last attempt to award the contract competitively. Their attempt to let a sole source lease to Boeing before that was overturned by Congress. This next round doesn’t look good either. There is a crying need for this capability and it lags because of politics, industrial policy and poor management.

AFL-CIO Endorses Awarding KC-X Contract To Boeing

October 13, 2009 by · Comment
Filed under: Syndicated Industry News 

At the AFL-CIO Now Blog there is a story about the ten presidents of the AFL-CIO state federations sending a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates endorsing giving the tanker contract to Boeing. The union heads state that this is not only in the best interests of U.S. national security but also as an industrial base issue.

One of the reasons the U.S. is where it is at with this contract is that there is only one domestic source for the aircraft, Boeing. The only other manufacturer that can be really considered is EADS. To achieve any level of competition they have to be included otherwise the U.S. should just go back to the sole source lease idea shot down in 2001 – 2003.

Navy Reorients LCS Acquistition Strategy

September 18, 2009 by · Comment
Filed under: BNET 

The U.S. Navy has decided to restructure the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program to use sole source production only after a contest next year….

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Army Selects L-3 to Supply Laser Marksmanship Training Systems

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--L-3 Communications (NYSE:LLL) announced today that the U.S. Army’s Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation has awarded L-3 MPRI a sole-source, follow-on contract for its Laser Marksmanship Training System (LMTS). This ID/IQ contract has an estimated value of $48.7 million over the initial base year and four option years. L-3 has received the program’s first delivery order, valued at $15.5 million. LMTS is a home station or depl

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Google Add to Yahoo My Web Email this Article

Universal Detection Technology Becomes Bio-detection Equipment Supplier to Emergency 911 Security, Inc., Certified by the Government for Sole Source and Limited Competition Contracts of up to 35.5 million Dollars Per Year

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Universal Detection Technology Becomes Bio-detection Equipment Supplier to Emergency 911 Security, Inc., Certified by Govt for Sole Source and Limited Competition Contracts of up to $35.5 million/year

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Google Add to Yahoo My Web Email this Article

>