Rapid loan com
Cashadvance cpm
Quickest cash advance
Short time loans
Easy bank loans
Dont be broke las vegas
Short term loans nashville tn
Empire loan augusta georgia
Bank of america get a small loan
100 dollar payroll advance
Loans deposited into checking account same day
Brighton financial payday loans
Get a 500 dollar loan with no credit
Petsonal lpans
500fastcas
Fast cash los angeles
Payday loans yakima wa
Loans in albuquerque nm
Installment loans based on your income
Cash advace for dad credit
Payday loans guarenteed
Online same day payday loan
Get cash advance with a 650 credit score
Loan with bad credit history texas
Best installment loans reviews
I have no credit history and i need a loan
Top ten quickest loans
Florida payday loan companies
Va internet payday loans
Legitimate lenders for people with bad credit
Can i get a loan to help me move
Direct loans by phone
Imapctcash com
Small line of credit bad credit
Places that give loans to people with no credit
Short term loans in pa bad credit
Small payday loans for 18 yr olds with bad credit
How can i get approed with poor credit
Cash advances in philadelphia pa
Signature loan direct deposit nofax
Online loans no credit check no fax
Tower loans ruston
Online installment loans missouri
Cashloan in lagrange ga
Loan byphone no donpayment
Money lending websites
Payday loans money same day
Money loans no checking account
900 online bad credit loan
Pay day loan no checking account
Cashnow loans
Personal loan old mutual
Florida no credit check financing
100 days of freedom loans
Loansbadcreditonline
24 hour loans online
1 online personal loans for bad credit
Lender to bad credit 1000
Pls loan store madison wi
Need 1000 dollars now
Shot term oans
Bad credit lease
Thousand dollar loan instantly
Www bad credit payday loans com
Verybadcreditloans
London kentucky payday loans
Private lenders in puyallup
I need 1000
Cash advance in san antonio
Money for low income people
Legitimate online loans no credit check
Quick easy online lenders
Payday loan in killeen texas
Www g loans com
Emergency cash bad credit
1000 loans today
Small loans santa fe nm
Rim and tire financing no credit check
Bad credit personal loan immediately
Automatic approval small loans
Pay day loans with low income
Loans up to 1000 secured
Payday loans plaistow nh
Cash loand
I need a fast payday loan
Loans money in minutes
Ace cssh loans
No credit check townhomes
Instant 300 loan
Call for a loan payday
Instant pay day loan
Apply for a cash advance
Where can i get a same day loan
What do i need for short term money loans
2000 installment loans
How to get 100 dollars fast
Need to borrow a 1000 dollars fast
California budget finance
America payday loan
Cash advance bakersfield ca
Quick guaranteed payday loans
Bakersfield loans
Www loans gov
Payday loans until taxes come
Guaranteed approval installment loand
Get a lone
Payday loans nj locations
Savannah ga yellow pages
I need a loan with a 495 credit score
Wisconsin payday loans
Payday loans with less than 10 percent interest
Payday cash advance naperville il
Reputable loan companies
Direct bad credit installments
No bank account loans
Instant payday loans no verification
Legit loan lenders
Check inadvance loans
One day money lending
Payday advance loans missoula mt
Online pay day lenders
One day payday loans
Ez money loan
Loans for cash with bad credit
Fundtimes payday
Online loan service
Get personal loan
Unsecured personal loans with no credit check
Find online loan applications from direct lenders
Loan for people on ssi
How can i get a personal loan online right now
Fastest place for a loan on the same day
Quick money loans now
Payday loans for unemployment direct lenders
Easy overnight approval loas
Instant no hassle payday loans
How to get approved for payday loans
Rapid loans direct com
5000 online loans
Direct lenders loans for no credit
Internet payday loans no fax
Installment loans alabama
Western sky loan
Loans tulsa ok
Online secure loans
Best online loan lender
Instant bad credit no credit check personal loans
Pay day loans albuqerque
No paperwork same day loans
60 second cash loans
Advance cash loan
Safeloan
Loans without teletrack
Payday cash 360 net
Payday loans near savage mn
Loans for people with bad credit in michigan
No tension loans that are legit and you esign
How many check stubs for a cash advance
Direct lenders for loans like ameriloan
Personal loann
Places to borrow money with bad credit
Payday loan naples florida
Www cashnet com
Very bad credit loan lenders same day approval
Pay day nation loan
Smart credit loan
24hr 1000 loan
Pay day loan portland oregon
Personal payday advance
Online repayment direct loans
Ez loan in nashville
Cash advance san antonio
Direct lenders alliance
Money advances in ca
How can i get a small loan with bad credit
Establish line of credit with capital one online
Tic toc pay day com
Tictactoccashadvance
I need of money now
No fax payday loans with out having direct deposit
Instantmone
Instantloansusa
Fast online loan
Pay day advance direct lenders
Applyy gor 1500 dollar loan
Fast cash loans no credit
Loansforpoorcreditonsocialsecurity
Sign up for free loan with bad credit
Instant approval payday loan
Easy qualifation loans in va
Payday loan no income verification
Bad or no credit instant approval loans
Easyloans
Where can i get a loan with low income
Cashfast com
247 esay approval for poor credit and bad credit loans
Guaranteed personal loans bad credit
Small loan up to 1000
Guaranteed poor credit personal loans nationwide
How to take out loans

Pentagon Clarifies Cost Increases on the JSF Production

A few weeks ago when a funding reprogramming from the Defense Department was submitted to the Congress for their consideration it caused Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) to question the program’s status. As part of the request it was asked by the Air Force to move over $240 million to pay cost increases on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) first production contracts. The total bill was actually closer to $750 million as the plan was to move internal JSF funding to make up the difference. Needless to say given the history of the program the SASC was not happy to see the further increases.

As part of their response McCain and Senator Levin (D-MI), the Chair, sent the Defense Department six questions about the reprogramming and the program’s funding status. One of the questions asked the Government to state how much of the cost increase is recoverable and most interestingly the cost to terminate the program.

The Pentagon has now responded to parts of the letter. They revealed that Lockheed Martin (LMT), the prime contractor, and Pratt & Whitney, part of United Technologies (UTX), will pay $283 million of the increase based on the cost sharing provisions of the production contracts.

One could assume this means the total bill to the Government now is below $500 million once this figure is subtracted. Unfortunately that is wrong. The total increase may ultimately be closer to $1 billion and the $283 million is the contractor share with the Pentagon picking up the rest, or just over $700 million. Pratt & Whitney estimates that their portion of the increase is about 6% of the total cost of the contracts.

The F-35 has suffered a series of production delays and cost increases due to testing issues and changes in the design of the aircraft. It had long been expected that there would be cost increases with the first three production batches. The Senate, though, has been trying to draw a hard line on future cost increases and have written into their version of the 2012 Authorization Act a requirement that Lockheed pick up all cost overruns beyond the target price and that the contract be a fixed price one. Normally at this stage in the program where much development and testing remains the contract would be cost plus and there would be some risk sharing as on the current ones.

There are many who are starting to get tired of the JSF status. The program has been re-baselined and repriced but it is not near its original schedule and cost. That is why the SASC raised the idea of terminating the program at its current state. This would be expensive, although no official estimate has been made, and would still leave the requirement for a new aircraft that would either require a new development program or a decision to buy an existing U.S. or foreign aircraft.

As with most things about the JSF there will be more to come in the near future on these latest rounds of cost increases and their ultimate effect on the program.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Department of Defense Not Really That Concerned with Boeing’s Costs for Tanker

At a recent public event the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Logistics & Technology, Ashton Carter, was asked about the projected cost increases for the KC-46A development. His response was that he, and OSD, are not really that worked up about the fact that Boeing (BA) may exceed the projected ceiling price of the contract.

In his eyes the U.S.’s liability is based on the $4.9 billion price. Boeing’s bid of $3.6 was a conscious business decision on their part. Some members of Congress, led by Senator John McCain (R-AZ), have raised concerns about the increase and the fact that the cost share structure of the contract obligates the U.S. to pay 60% of the first billion in increases.

There is also the idea that this situation would encourage contractors to submit low estimates for development contracts, or buy-in, with the goal of making up the difference in their production or by having the U.S. pay some of the overruns. McCain and the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) are also investigating the large cost increases in F-35 production that are requiring the U.S. to pay over $700 million as part of their cost share.

The idea that the Defense Department would accept this kind of business model is interesting. One of the criticisms of defense acquisition is this very point. In the late Sixties when Lockheed, now Lockheed Martin (LMT), did the same with the C-5 transport, although perhaps not deliberately, it is considered one of the examples of acquisition abuse and the program was almost cancelled. Now Carter is saying that as long as it involves a Firm Fixed Price Contract it is an acceptable practice.

This is just the beginning of the situation and Boeing certainly has the ability to not charge more then the ceiling price as they work the KC-46A development. Their current estimate of about $5.2 billion may be conservative and costs for the first 18 aircraft could be under $4.9 billion.

Senators Levin and McCain Send Questions on F-35 Reprogramming

Earlier this week it was reported, and tweeted, by Senator John McCain (R-AZ) that the Department of Defense as part of a reprogramming request needed $264 million to cover cost increases on the first three Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) contracts for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). Now Senator Levin (D-MI) the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and McCain, the Ranking Member, have sent a letter with a series of questions to OSD about the reprogramming and the Government’s obligations to lead contractor Lockheed Martin (LMT).

The Omnibus Reprogramming request which is often annually submitted to Congress by OSD allows the move of large amount of funds from different appropriations and services to pay higher priority bills. Often during the years of heaviest engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan it converted Research & Development (RDT&E) and Procurement funds to those used to pay for Operations and Maintenance (O&M). In this years’ it asked for the $264 million to be reprogrammed to pay for “cost growth on the first three F-35 low rate initial production lots (LRIPs 1-3).” It also informed the Congress that there would be a requirement for a further $496.2 million found within JSF’s funding to pay for the rest of the cost increases coming to a grand total of $760.2 million.

The letter asks the Department to answer a series of questions and says the reprogramming won’t be considered until they are answered. These include whether the Government is legally obligated to pay the cost increases, what would be the effect if the request for reprogramming was denied, what other alternatives are there, are the cost increases recoverable, what would be the termination costs for the F-35 program, and how Defense intends to prevent these types of overruns in the first place.

This is the second time in recent months that McCain has raised the specter of cancelling the F-35 contract. Earlier he had tried to have an amendment added to the Authorization Bill requiring termination if cost growth was above a certain point. That failed in Committee by one vote. Now it is clear that Levin, the senior Democrat on the Committee and Chair, is willing to at least put the question out there.

Termination costs for a contract like the F-35 development and production would most likely be in the billions. While McCain has led discussion of this idea it will be hard for the Government to end the program. There is still a requirement for a new aircraft to replace the aging F-16, F/A-18 and AV-8A systems in current inventory. The U.S. has finished buying F-22 and the production line will be shutting down. The F/A-18 is available but any other exiting aircraft that might be considered is non-U.S. A new development program could be started but that would probably end up being more expensive then the current F-35.

Even so the continued cost growth in the program is leading many in Congress to reconsider the future investment in the F-35 in this time of budgetary pressures. McCain especially seems likely to keep up the pressure on the program and Lockheed.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Reports that Initial F-35 Production Batch Costs Over Target Costs

Yesterday Senator John McCain (R-AZ) caused a stir by tweeting that the Pentagon had requested $264 million as part of a reprogramming as a “downpayment” on the cost overruns for the the first three production batches of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

He also said that the total cost would be closer to $800 million. As with a many programs at the stage of the acquisition cycle Lockheed Martin’s (LMT) F-35 is in the government and contractor share cost increases beyond the target or ceiling price. Reportedly this cost increase applies to the first 28 aircraft ordered by the Defense Department.

The Defense Department and Joint Project Office have yet to confirm McCain’s information.

The F-35 is an advanced tactical aircraft being developed to replace F-16, F/A-18 and A/V-8A aircraft currently in service with the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps as well as for many U.S. Allied nations. It is the largest defense acquisition program ever planned to date and has suffered from cost and schedule growth due to testing and development issues.

The production buy currently being planned will be the fourth batch and the largest. There has been frustration over the cost increases with the program by many in Congress and especially McCain. The Senate Armed Services Committee recently added to the 2012 Defense Authorization Bill specific language for the F-35 limiting the government’s exposure to cost overruns. The bill if it becomes law after conference with the House would require Lockheed to be responsible for all cost increases past the target price rather then the Government and it sharing in them.

McCain also attempted in Committee to add language that would have allowed the Government to terminate the program if cost increases for the next production lot exceeded ten percent. That vote failed in committee but by only one vote. This illustrates the concern many have for the increased costs the program is facing.

If the contract was cancelled the U.S. would be faced with buying more Boeing (BA) F/A-18 or non-U.S. aircraft or even re-starting the F-22 production line to meet the requirement while a new fighter program was started.

The chances of terminating the contract are low due to the amount of money already invested in it. A more likely scenario is reduced quantities or a longer production run due to cost and funding limitations.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

John McCain Inserts Himself Into KC-X Competition

October 23, 2009 by · Comment
Filed under: KC-X, KC-X Tanker News, Syndicated Industry News 

Senator John McCain (R-AZ) whose efforts frustrated the Air Force’s attempts to award Boeing a lease deal for the new tanker back in 2001 – 2004 started the whole competition now says that he wants an independent “watchdog” as part of this source selection. He was not clear as to who he would want to do this but hopes to have an unbiased source selection.

If there is a protest over the latest attempt the GAO will be the “independent” agency tasked with sorting that out. If they fail there is always the U.S. Court of Appeals. Those should be independent enough for Senator McCain.

>