<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Procurement News &#187; logistic support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/tags/logistic-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com</link>
	<description>In-Depth Coverage of the Defense Procurement Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Contracting Goals In Afghanistan Raising Favoritism Concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2010/06/02/u-s-contracting-goals-in-afghanistan-raising-favoritism-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2010/06/02/u-s-contracting-goals-in-afghanistan-raising-favoritism-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghan economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliant product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense logistics agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountainous nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nato allies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perimeter defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=16372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. government is spending a great deal of money in Afghanistan for commercial services and logistic support. This is necessary due to the limited size of the U.S. military and of its NATO allies as well as the land locked and mountainous nature of the country but concerns have arisen with how the money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i.bnet.com/blogs/barrier-contract-raises-issue-with-afghanistan-spending-plans.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-6595" title="barrier-contract-raises-issue-with-afghanistan-spending-plans" src="http://i.bnet.com/blogs/barrier-contract-raises-issue-with-afghanistan-spending-plans.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="195" /></a>The U.S. government is spending a great deal of money in Afghanistan for commercial services and logistic support.  This is necessary due to the limited size of the U.S. military and of its NATO allies as well as the land locked and mountainous nature of the country but concerns have arisen with how the money is being spent.</p>
<p>One reason is that the U.S. has a plan to spend as much money as possible on domestic companies and providers so that they will help build a sustainable Afghan economy.  This is one of the keys to making that country functional without a massive U.S. and allied presence and the United States is willing to leverage its contracting policies to help support this effort.</p>
<p>One company that is feeling the negative effect of this policy and is not happy about it is <strong>Infrastructure Defense Technologies</strong> (IDT) from <strong>Illinois</strong>.  They manufacture among other products special earth filled barriers used to provide perimeter defense at bases from direct fire as well as explosive attack.  <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/infrastructure-defense-technologies-llc-protests-monopoly-on-defense-department-contract-to-protect-us-troops-91697174.html">In 2008 they bid on a contract to provide this kind of product</a> for use in Iraq and Afghanistan potentially worth up to $400 million.  The contract did not go to them but a foreign company. IDT <a href="http://www.wrex.com/Global/story.asp?S=12394703">has protested this award twice</a> now.</p>
<p>IDT feels that despite there better product they were slighted due to the Pentagon&#8217;s desire to have this material made in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of their plan to build up the economy.  IDT <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/04/pentagon-doles-out-sweetheart-deals-for-wartime-supplies/">lost a lawsuit with the <strong>Defense Logistics Agency</strong> (DLA)</a> on the grounds that the British company chosen, <strong>Hesco Bastion</strong>, could fulfill the needs of the contract.  This is one of the main reasons used to justify sole source awards no matter what the cost &#8212; the supplier is the only one who can provide a technically compliant product in the amount of time required.  Often these contracts end up costing more then if they were competitively bid and awarded.</p>
<p>Sometimes the desire to contract efficiently and ethically may not be supported by other policies or needs.  In Afghanistan it seems that the hope of spending large amount of U.S. tax dollars in the local economy will support the mission of building and effective government and economy.  Even if this plan hurts U.S. businesses and doesn&#8217;t get the most bang for the buck.</p>
<p><em>Photo from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/takomabibelot/">takomabibelot&#8217;s flickr photostream</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2010/06/02/u-s-contracting-goals-in-afghanistan-raising-favoritism-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense Solutions Holding Hits The Big Time</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2010/02/01/defense-solutions-holding-hits-the-big-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2010/02/01/defense-solutions-holding-hits-the-big-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Systems Holding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foodstuffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraqi government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last thirty years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=13343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots of little defense contractors who are started by people wanting more then just working for another company. They usually start with one or two small sub-contracts and work to establish a reputation or an opportunity to bid as a prime on a larger contract. This business model has been highly successful for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of little defense contractors who are started by people wanting more then just working for another company.  They usually start with one or two small sub-contracts and work to establish a reputation or an opportunity to bid as a prime on a larger contract.  This business model has been highly successful for the last thirty years.  Of course for every company that makes it several do not.</p>
<p>The small defense contractor, Defense Solutions Holding, Inc, has had some luck in winning logistic support contracts in Iraq and other countries.  <a href="http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2010/01/29/defense-solutions-holding-inc-dfsh-finalizing-foodstuff-contract-with-the-government-of-iraq-press-release/">Revenue in 2009 was on track to be under $2 million</a>.  They just announced that they have won a contract to provide foodstuffs to the Iraqi Government in a deal worth over $60 million if all options are exercised.</p>
<p>This is a major growth for a company this size and illustrates well how the business can work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2010/02/01/defense-solutions-holding-hits-the-big-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navistar To Provide More Trucks To U.S. Army</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/11/10/navistar-to-provide-more-trucks-to-u-s-army/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/11/10/navistar-to-provide-more-trucks-to-u-s-army/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navistar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oshkosh Truck Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enemy attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oshkosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tanker trucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transport vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troop transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=11811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States military has expended a great deal of logistics and support vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan. These trucks have taken a beating both from heavy use and enemy attacks. The Army has let several contracts recently to repair, reset and replace them. Yesterday it was announced that Navistar would be awarded a contract [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States military has expended a great deal of logistics and support vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan.  These trucks have taken a beating both from heavy use and enemy attacks.  The <strong>Army</strong> has let several contracts recently to repair, reset and replace them.  Yesterday it was announced that <strong>Navistar</strong> would be awarded a contract to provide tanker trucks, wreckers and generic troop transport vehicles.  <a href="http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20091109/FREE/911099983#">The value of this contract is over $400 million</a>.</p>
<p>Navistar was disappointed that it did not win a portion of the <strong>MRAP-ATV</strong> contract to provide the lighter vehicles for use in Afghanistan.  That contract went to <strong>Oshkosh</strong>.  This contract will offset some of the losses from not contributing to that effort.  It also demonstrates that the U.S. has been able to grow a decent industrial base when it comes to logistic support vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/11/10/navistar-to-provide-more-trucks-to-u-s-army/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contractors Good For Something &#8212; Being A Force Mulitplier In Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/09/02/contractors-good-for-something-being-a-force-mulitplier-in-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/09/02/contractors-good-for-something-being-a-force-mulitplier-in-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SETA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil servants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[command headquarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consistent philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foot soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holy hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housekeeping services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suiters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=10196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last eight years one of the biggest complaints from the American left was that George Bush was in the sway of big government contractors. They did too much of the housekeeping services in Iraq and Afghanistan. Companies like KBR lined their pockets at the expense of the troops and taxpayers. They were doing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last eight years one of the biggest complaints from the American left was that <strong>George Bush</strong> was in the sway of big government contractors.  They did too much of the housekeeping services in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Companies like <strong>KBR</strong> lined their pockets at the expense of the troops and taxpayers.  They were doing jobs that green suiters or civil servants should be doing.</p>
<p>Unfortunately due to the small size of the military they had to use contractors for those jobs.  This has been a trend going back thirty years.  Use contractors to wash clothes, cook food and clean latrines.  Then there would be more soldiers freed up to do the fighting.  Despite a consistent philosophy on the use of support contractors Bush received holy hell about it.  True the scale in Iraq was much larger then it ever had been before and the contracts were in some case let quickly and didn&#8217;t have enough oversight but people were trying to get things done.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/afghanistan/la-fg-afghan-troops2-2009sep02,0,6170770.story">Now the word is that <strong>Obama</strong> wants to increase the number of foot soldiers in <strong>Afghanistan</strong> but without increasing the number of U.S. troops deployed to that country</a>.  One way to do this is to reduce the number of soldiers assigned to logistic support units, command headquarters, maintenance and so one and do a one-for-one swap with &#8220;trigger pullers&#8221;.  How do you do this and still provide the enormous tail that U.S. forces need?  Use contractors.</p>
<p>It might be possible to assign U.S. civil servants to do this but there have been many issues in the past with getting them to serve in Iraq and Afghanistan.  It is too dangerous or not career enhancing.  Certainly there is a number of people assigned or who volunteer for these positions but to get the kind of capability that is needed it will have to be contractors.  Contractors like KBR or other such companies experienced in logistics and maintenance.</p>
<p>This will not be an easy or quick switch.  The ground troops will have to be designated from either those in Iraq or in the U.S. recovering from a recent deployment.  Then they will have to be trained and equipped up.  A plan will be figured out how to deploy a 1000 support troops and replace them with a battalion of infantry.  The support infrastructure will probably have to switch first.  Contractors taking over for the rear echelon folks.</p>
<p>Another challenge will be writing and awarding the contracts for this.  Unless they plan on expanding existing contracts there will be a several month period of writing the RFP, putting it out and evaluating the proposals.  Awards may be protested which could add to the delays.  Once awarded the contractors will have to hire their people and get them into place.  Expect the almost constant sniping from Congress and the Media about this.  <a href="http://industry.bnet.com/government/10001653/logcap-iii-illustrates-why-government-contracting-can-be-prolonged/">See the LOGCAP contract from Iraq for example</a>.</p>
<p>The Obama administration really cannot do anything else.  They have reached the fish-or-cut-bait point.  Either abandon Afghanistan or pour resources in.  At the same time he does not want to &#8220;surge&#8221; troops there as that will make him and many Democrats look like idiots for opposing the same in Iraq.  So he does the next best thing:  surge contractors to maximize his troop availability.  Good luck to them and the soldiers.</p>
<p>Cross posted at <a href="www.inanetaskers.blogspot.com">Inane Taskers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/09/02/contractors-good-for-something-being-a-force-mulitplier-in-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oshkosh Wins Another Contract</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/08/28/oshkosh-wins-another-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/08/28/oshkosh-wins-another-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oshkosh Truck Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armored personnel carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fmtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy truck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next five years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oshkosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tanks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=10115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following up on its recent MRAP-ATV and heavy truck contracts Oshkosh announced that they have been awarded another contract to build Family of Medium Tactical Vehicle (FMTV) trucks and trailers. This contract is called the rebuy program. If all options are exercised over the next five years the contract could be worth up to $2.6 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/08/17/oshkosh-keeps-winning/">Following up on its recent <strong>MRAP-ATV</strong> and heavy truck contracts <strong>Oshkosh</strong> announced that they have been awarded another contract to build <strong>Family of Medium Tactical Vehicle</strong> (FMTV) trucks and trailers</a>.  This contract is called the rebuy program.  If all options are exercised over the next five years the contract could be worth up to $2.6 billion.</p>
<p>The initial order is for about $280 million worth of the vehicles.  The rebuy seems to indicate that this contract is to begin replenishing the supply of the vehicles in the Army.  The U.S. lost a great deal of vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan to IED and mines.  These were of all types including tanks, armored personnel carriers and logistic support vehicles like the FMTV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/08/28/oshkosh-wins-another-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9 billion euro contract for 112 Eurofighter Typhoons signed &#8211; Press Release</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/07/31/9-billion-euro-contract-for-112-eurofighter-typhoons-signed-press-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/07/31/9-billion-euro-contract-for-112-eurofighter-typhoons-signed-press-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Additions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air superiority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antonino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eurofighter typhoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fleets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leading edge technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nato missions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typhoons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=9242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9 billion euro contract for 112 Eurofighter Typhoons signed NETMA (NATO Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency), Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH and EUROJET Turbo GmbH signed today the production contract for a further 112 aircraft, including 241 engines, for the four partner Nations: Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. The Tranche 3.9 billion contract confirms Eurofighter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>9 billion euro contract for 112 Eurofighter Typhoons signed</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9245" title="eurofighter-new" src="http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/eurofighter-new.jpg" alt="eurofighter-new" width="85" height="61" />NETMA (NATO Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency), Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug  GmbH and EUROJET Turbo GmbH signed today the production contract for a further 112  aircraft, including 241 engines, for the four partner Nations: Germany, Italy, Spain and the  United Kingdom.</p>
<p>The Tranche 3.9 billion contract confirms Eurofighter Typhoon as the best selling defence  aircraft on the market with 559 units under production contract, including 15 for Austria and 72  for Saudi Arabia.</p>
<p>Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH CEO Enzo Casolini commented: “This is a major achievement  in the Eurofighter programme and serves to reaffirm the importance and the independence of  the defence sector of the European industry. The agreement, achieved in conjunction with  NETMA and the four Nations involved in the programme, will provide the Air Forces with the  best asset available to address their requirements for both air-to-air and air-to-ground roles”.<br />
EUROJET Managing Director Hartmut J. Tenter commented: “This is an outstanding success  for the EUROJET programme and a clear signal to the international community endorsing the  quality of the product. The EJ200 stands for leading-edge technology, including advanced  integrated Health Monitoring to deliver class-leading reliability, maintainability and Through Life  Cost—the benchmark of excellence”.</p>
<p>NETMA’s General Manager, Lt.Gen. Antonino Altorio remarked that “the capabilities of Tranche  3 aircraft consolidate the already excellent performances of Tranche 1 and 2 aircraft and will  enable the Air Forces to carry out primary air defence in NATO missions as well as maintaining  air superiority in theatres of operations and, if necessary, providing support in the air-to-ground  role. This contract sets the baseline for consequent contracts for logistic support which is  fundamental to keeping fleets available while reducing, significantly, the cost of in-service  support”.</p>
<p>Today the Eurofighter programme not only represents the largest European industrial  programme, supporting 100,000 jobs in 400 companies across Europe, but it is also the most  advanced example of technology within the European industry base. It sets the standard in  terms of best value for a new generation defence aircraft programme.</p>
<p>With the production of Eurofighter Typhoon, now being confirmed until well into the next  decade, the future of the programme is assured and will maintain and develop the current  technological capability in Europe, enhancing future export opportunities and giving the four  partner Nations a significant return on their investments. Having already secured two export  contracts with Austria in 2003 and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 2007, Eurofighter Typhoon  will continue to follow up all export opportunities.</p>
<p>NETMA</p>
<p>Eurofighter and Eurojet Turbo consortia and their partner Companies are actively pursuing  campaigns in Switzerland, India, Japan, Romania, Greece, Turkey and exploring possible  opportunities in South Korea, Bulgaria, Croatia and other Nations.</p>
<p>Background information:</p>
<p>Eurofighter Typhoon is the world&#8217;s most advanced new generation real multi-role/swing-role  combat aircraft available on the market and has been ordered by six nations (Germany, Italy,  Spain, United Kingdom, Austria and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). With 559 aircraft under<br />
production contract, it is Europe’s largest military collaborative programme and delivers leadingedge  technology, strengthening Europe’s aerospace industry in the global competitive market.<br />
More than 100,000 jobs in 400 companies are secured by the programme. Eurofighter  Jagdflugzeug GmbH manages the programme on behalf of the Eurofighter Partner Companies:  Alenia Finmeccanica, BAE Systems, EADS CASA and EADS Deutschland, Europe’s foremost  aerospace companies with a total turnover of approx. 88 billion Euros (2008).</p>
<p>The EUROJET consortium is responsible for the management of development, support and  export of the new generation EJ200 engine system, installed in the Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft.  EUROJET’s shareholders comprise Avio (Italy), ITP (Spain), MTU Aero Engines (Germany) and  Rolls-Royce (UK). The EJ200 engine, with its unprecedented performance record combined  with multi-role capability and highest availability at low life-cycle costs, is perfectly set to meet  the air forces’ demands of today and the future.</p>
<p>NETMA was formed on 1 January 1996 by the merger of two previously separate NATO  agencies which had been established to manage Tornado and Eurofighter (EF2000)  programmes.</p>
<p>The Agency is responsible to the partner Nations (Germany, Italy, Spain and the United  Kingdom) for all the aspects of the programme covering development, procurement and inservice  support of Eurofighter and Tornado aircraft weapon systems. NETMA provides partner  Nations with an efficient, effective and coherent management service for these two major  international programmes.</p>
<p>High Resolution images of the Eurofighter Typhoon and of the EJ200 can be downloaded from  the web sites: <a href="http://www.eurofighter.com/medialibrary">www.eurofighter.com/medialibrary</a> and <a href="http://www.eurojet.eu">www.eurojet.eu</a></p>
<p>Photo courtesy of Eurofighter.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/07/31/9-billion-euro-contract-for-112-eurofighter-typhoons-signed-press-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successful first operational NATO assessment of a Eurofighter Wing &#8212; Press Release</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/07/02/successful-first-operational-nato-assessment-of-a-eurofighter-wing-press-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/07/02/successful-first-operational-nato-assessment-of-a-eurofighter-wing-press-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EADS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eurofighter typhoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gioia del colle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italian air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italian pilots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace keeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[response force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunication services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typhoons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=8425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Successful first operational NATO assessment of a Eurofighter Wing Excellent results were achieved after the first operational evaluation made by NATO of a Eurofighter Typhoon Wing. A NATO evaluation team certified the Italian Air Force’s 4th Fighter Wing at the Grosseto Base as a NATO Quick Response Force. This means that the 4th Wing becomes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Successful first operational NATO assessment of a Eurofighter Wing</p>
<p>Excellent results were achieved after the first operational evaluation made by NATO of a Eurofighter Typhoon Wing. A NATO evaluation team certified the Italian Air Force’s 4th Fighter Wing at the Grosseto Base as a NATO Quick Response Force.<br />
This means that the 4th Wing becomes the first Eurofighter flight unit to obtain this important NATO certification.<br />
The operational evaluation took place during the “Operation Discrete Jury” exercise, which tested the ability of the 4th Wing to be deployed abroad for peace-keeping and peace-making missions.</p>
<p>The exercise involved many air wings’ activities, from rescue to telecommunication services, self-defence and survival capabilities and, more particularly, logistic support, maintenance and flight operations. It was in this very field that the operations of the Grosseto Base’s Typhoons were positively evaluated, having demonstrated excellent operational availability and compliance with national and NATO’s operational requirement.</p>
<p>Enzo Casolini, Eurofighter CEO, said: “We are very pleased that the first Wing of Eurofighter Typhoon has achieved such an important goal. This clearly demonstrates the maturity of the Eurofighter programme as well as highlighting the capabilities of the aircraft and its operational availability which reached a very high level”.</p>
<p>The 4th Fighter Wing, together with the 5th Wing of Cervia, the 36th of Gioia del Colle and the 37th of Trapani, is one of the Italian Air Force units assigned to the control of Italian airspace 24 hours a day all year round.<br />
Within the 4th Fighter Wing, the 20 Squadron is also active with its twin-seat Typhoons which are tasked with the “transition” of Italian pilots assigned to the Eurofighter Squadrons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2009/07/02/successful-first-operational-nato-assessment-of-a-eurofighter-wing-press-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Army Buys More Hunter UAV Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2008/11/03/us-army-buys-more-hunter-uav-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2008/11/03/us-army-buys-more-hunter-uav-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northrop Grumman Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contractor logistics support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground control stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grumman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military personnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northrop grumman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=3733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Army awarded Northrop Grumman a contract valued at $97 M for Hunter Unmanned Aeriel Vehicles (UAV) and ground control stations. The Los Angeles Times reported on the order. Interestingly the article said that the systems were being procured through the &#8220;contractor logistic support 2008 contract&#8221;. Contractor Logistics Support is usually where a civilian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>US Army</strong> awarded <strong>Northrop Grumman</strong> a contract valued at $97 M for Hunter Unmanned Aeriel Vehicles (UAV) and ground control stations.  The <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/losangeles/stories/2008/11/03/daily2.html">Los Angeles Times reported</a> on the order.  Interestingly the article said that the systems were being procured through the &#8220;contractor logistic support 2008 contract&#8221;.  Contractor Logistics Support is usually where a civilian company is paid to provide the maintenance and support for the system, rather then using organic military personnel and parts.  It may be that the contract has both production and CLS lines on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2008/11/03/us-army-buys-more-hunter-uav-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Air Force Awards Alenia North America Approximately $7 Million Logistics Support Contract for Afghan C-27/G.222</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/1969/12/31/u-s-air-force-awards-alenia-north-america-approximately-7-million-logistics-support-contract-for-afghan-c-27g-222/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/1969/12/31/u-s-air-force-awards-alenia-north-america-approximately-7-million-logistics-support-contract-for-afghan-c-27g-222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Business Wire Defense: Contracts News</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Syndicated Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeronautica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army air corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finmeccanica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g 222]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistic support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistical support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u s air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u s air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20091005005926en</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Alenia North America, a subsidiary of Alenia Aeronautica and part of the Finmeccanica Group has been awarded a contract by the U.S. Air Force (USAF) to provide logistic support and maintenance in Afghanistan for the C-27/G.222 aircraft currently being delivered for the Afghanistan National Army Air Corps (ANAAC). The $7 million contract provides for additional logistic support and maintenance for the program. The logistical support in Afghanistan is being conducted b<br />
<br />
  <a href='http://www.pheedcontent.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:f51b4a55dc482ff02997d74b945d0860:KP0hzR9B3RjlERDjjP4uIig98PdGbvq%2BmK63SmkOWtrwqko9z5vZM7GWEnkZvjFQYlMgpTOY93wz'><img border='0' alt='Add to digg'></a>
  <a href='http://www.pheedcontent.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:f2c1e7e61ba4a1cc049f28b47285e3d4:e3CZz45PmX%2B4jN0P%2BlgYYthCBig0LnOKNSr1U%2BxHOZt9W%2B4S8aQefVfEUf4emSZVox7HvJHnPvD2'><img border='0' alt='Add to del.icio.us'></a>
  <a href='http://www.pheedcontent.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:3b07a0312629d41fcad1ebeea34a506d:k13kEp5tlRgbwpqv3b8xeSOOhz6LFgsxTVzx14uf7mcER9Ty3WyBEL5Ilcf57EfOxLn5l9lMgdYJCw%3D%3D'><img border='0' alt='Add to Newsvine'></a>
  <a href='http://www.pheedcontent.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:774f0075045d7637c49953be3c4bfcc0:8hcsS%2F7fsnZFoV5gPkyRqZIajw7gNDRuv7xx8%2F89rXIpprw%2FpoNaGOKpt2yxjeOYadHFSYsqJeFC'><img border='0' alt='Add to Reddit'></a>
  <a href='http://www.pheedcontent.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:55d50c4ea8c7ad47eaa0c5254c8280f2:tuuEmkEQRwKMfuv50i3KdbJRIs22lUPQXrc2RwhW%2FGS%2F0bO7g%2BLTVwz8dVfsFg8h85wbTaRbYC9N'><img border='0' alt='Add to Google'></a>
  <a href='http://www.pheedcontent.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:410af83096b946c7f8707c83dc41a340:PhGKaQ5IJLQ9R%2BAI8H0adykOkQW09PQEHRFNjLuqzzaPt1Y6QTmw7e6%2BXWA9bZ0AAqDhWCTCS5Bb'><img border='0' alt='Add to Yahoo My Web'></a>
  <a href='http://www.pheedcontent.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:20a19e4d64ae353f63a9d1ea6308d250:hvSASw9qwrc%2FA3pE7fwid6swkfys8aCzXFPNtNo5PmTJwtCrnn7IsRAGQyRy%2FlOjJUKfnvIIYxKj'><img border='0' alt='Email this Article'></a>
<br />
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=95eb13ea6eea7b064b62668afd1880c1&#38;p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0" border="0"></a>
<!-- foo -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Alenia North America, a subsidiary of Alenia Aeronautica and part of the Finmeccanica Group has been awarded a contract by the U.S. Air Force (USAF) to provide logistic support and maintenance in Afghanistan for the C-27/G.222 aircraft currently being delivered for the Afghanistan National Army Air Corps (ANAAC). The $7 million contract provides for additional logistic support and maintenance for the program. The logistical support in Afghanistan is being conducted b<br />
<br />
  <a><img border='0' alt='Add to digg'></a>
  <a><img border='0' alt='Add to del.icio.us'></a>
  <a><img border='0' alt='Add to Newsvine'></a>
  <a><img border='0' alt='Add to Reddit'></a>
  <a><img border='0' alt='Add to Google'></a>
  <a><img border='0' alt='Add to Yahoo My Web'></a>
  <a><img border='0' alt='Email this Article'></a>
<br />
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=95eb13ea6eea7b064b62668afd1880c1&amp;p=1"><img alt="" border="0"></a>
<!-- foo -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/1969/12/31/u-s-air-force-awards-alenia-north-america-approximately-7-million-logistics-support-contract-for-afghan-c-27g-222/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.372 seconds -->
