Defense contract requirements to be loosened
Filed under: Commentary, Congress, Federal Budget Process, IT, Military Aviation, SETA, U.S. Army, development program, logistics, production program
One of the issues that faces any company trying to do business with the US DoD is that the personnel requirements are usually pretty stiff. This is especially true for SETA type work. The military is usually looking to hire experienced people with clearances. This is why you find so many retired military and federal workers as contractors. Getting a clearance has become an issue as the Federal government has been bogged down for years trying to clear people. The easiest way to get one is to join the military; or work for the government. These requirements also make it harder when you are trying to hire someone. Now, the Army in Huntsville has recognized these factors and is making efforts to change them. They are trying to relax the experience and degree requirements to allow newer hires out of college; they are also making it easier to hire interns to get them clearances and experience before they graduate.
See the Huntsville Times for the story.
MDA awards SETA contracts
Filed under: Contract Awards, IT, MDA, SETA, Teledyne Technologies, development program, missile defense
The last round of BRAC moved a significant number of MDA assets to Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, AL. Now two SETA contracts were awarded recently to support the agency. DMD was given an ID/IQ contract that could be worth over $40 M if all options are executed. Teledyne Solutions was also awarded one that is worth over $150 M. Both contracts have multiple options, and with all ID/IQ contracts there is no guarantee any work will be given out.
See The Huntsville Times for more.
Story on earmarks illustrates issue
Filed under: Congress, Contract Awards, Digital Fusion, Federal Budget Process, SMDC, crime
The Wall Street Journal and The Huntsville Times both have stories today on Congressional Earmarks, the Defense budget and corruption. See the stories here and here. The Journal highlights how a Huntsville company, Digital Fusion, received an earmarked contract from a Texas Democrat at around the same time they gave him a large campaign contribution. The Times is following up on a recent case where Federal workers at the Space and Missile Defense Command (SMDC) were taking bribes from contractors for giving contracts to them. In that case the contractors have yet to be named. The Federal investigators as part of their follow-up are looking at companies that received earmarked contracts through SMDC. The first case is not a crime unless you can tie the contribution directly to the contract award which is almost impossible without some kind of documentation. That is what befell Congressman Cunningham from California as they had written evidence linking the two events. SMDC spreads a lot of RDT&E money around each year, much of it earmarked by local Senators and Congressman. All received campaign contributions from contractors and deny any linkage. You be the judge.
Corruption case at Redstone Arsenal continues
Filed under: Contract Awards, Federal Budget Process, SMDC, crime
According to this story in The Huntsville Times, an official from the Army’s Redstone Arsenal pleaded guilty in a corruption cast that broke a few months ago. His boss was the one who was more dirty. Both took bribes from contractors to steer business there way. The interesting part of the story is that more is starting to come out. Previously there had been no mention of the companies involved, but in the article they refer to a unnamed minority owned company. It also discusses that a contractor lobbied Congress for earmarks that were then steered to that contractor. Another example of how the Federal Budget is manipulated.





