research paper online help
i need help with a title for my essay
college essay help in bay area
cv helpers
resume writers in birmingham al
letter of recommendation formatting service
buy king39s speech online
college paper writers
essays writing services
free college assignment help
essay on birth order
buy paper shredder sri lanka
dissertation buy
help me write a outline
buy rolling papers online us
best resume writers reviews
freelance writer pay
business plan writer raleigh nc
resume services las vegas
need help with outline
get someone to write your essay
examples of customer service resume titles
help writing a paper apa style
papers needed to buy a car
freedom writers movie essay paper
homework helpers english language and composition
where to buy an essay
woodlands junior school homework help india
essay topics civil services
mba essay help writing
freelance writer rates 2013
writing services online
custom research proposal review writing
lady of shalott essay help
help creating a condensation
buy college degree certificate
custom term paper writing
how to help your kids with homework
cv writing services napier
military conspectus writing service
annotated bibliography writing services
my custom van essay
quality custom essays
english literature essay writing services
case study pediatric bipolar disorder
us government recommendation letter writing service
free essay writing helper
how to write my personal statement
best abridgment writing services for educators
custom admission essay
customer service resume samples 2013
writing dissertation service
letter writing service uk
resume writer rates
cover letter customer service representative examples
best recommendation letter writing services nj
free online help with research paper
chegg homework help textbook solutions
best college essay service
purchase cheap essay
resume writers orange county
help making a outline
write my apa paper for me
buy eassy in the online
buy essays online townie
get paid to write short stories online
cover letter of customer service representative
executive digest writing service seattle
best essay writers of all time
help writing a paper for college
best medical school essay editing service
birth essay order
cover letter customer service administrator
resume writing services lansing mi
free online help with writing essays
essays on service
research paper writer net samples
resume writers minneapolis mn
writers for hire toronto
resume writing service virginia beach va
business school essay editing services
customer service essay questions
essay help for ged
personal statement writing services
buy essay writing service
homework help for parents and children
research paper title help
help writing abridgment
professional cv writers in hull
resume writing services hobart
essay buy online
how to write windows service in c vs2010
essay help compare and contrast
dissertation statistics help
personal statement customer service assistant
help business plan writing
professional resume writers rochester ny
where can you buy compendium paper
resume writing services victoria bc
resume writers northern nj
help with book reports
writing help for esl students
top 7 websites to help with homework
personal statement help art
research paper writer online
essay on community helpers for kids
buy essays online cheap uk
is homework harmful or helpful arguments
compendium help me
buy essay price
help in my math homework
cv writing centre co uk our services
federal resume writers reviews
resume writers chicago il
best brief writing services in india
help with spanish homework online free
formal letter writing service
resume writing services brooklyn ny
bobcat mp5 review article custom
cheap essay writing services
paper writing services in brooklyn
freelance dental writer
professional resume writing services in dallas tx
best resume writers in australia
professional cv writer ireland
help with finance homework for free
help writing my online dating profile
help writing a compendium
help make a digest
freelance grant writer contract
examples of resume objectives for customer service
a manual for writers of research papers theses and dissertations 7th edition download
essay writing service in london
dissertation writing editing help
personal statement service medical school
college essay proofreading service
nursing brief help
resume writing services for project managers
resume professional writers toronto
service recovery presentation powerpoint
write my essay promo code
cv writing services uk reviews
college preparatory mathematics homework help
executive conspectus writing services nyc
can i buy a college essay
critical thinking for helping professionals a skillsbased workbook
top abstract writing services 2013
homework help chat room free
buy an english essay
anxiety case disorder social study
precis help skills
resume professional writers perth
get paid to write essays for students
help with writing college application essay
spss coursework help
courseworks columbia help
best free essay writing service
gfk custom research north america chicago
professional cv writers north east
help writing cover letter
service learning project essays
case studies people narcissistic personality disorder
help writing resume profile
custom writing paper name
help me cheat on my math homework
cv help free
help building a cv
cheap professional resume writing services
case disorder multiple personality study
cv writing service peterborough
best synopsis writing services in atlanta ga
buying a dissertation forum
i need someone to write my paper
custom writings services
help writing a recommendation letter
professional resume writers houston
help with my homework 2
writing stuff down helps you remember
essay help in australia
job cv help
help paper to bed in formal cover
buy apa research papers
ghostwriter app problems
where can i buy conspectus paper
writing services agreement
essay uk writers
cheapest online essays
order of things in a lab report
resume services kent wa
veterans day essay help
custom paper tubes canada
personal service statement of claim
buy coursework uk
resume making services melbourne
advanced accounting homework help
how to put an annotated bibliography in alphabetical order
buy good essay
help me on my homework for free
professional resume writing services in virginia beach
customer service personal statement sample

Panetta Lays Out Initial Defense Budget Spending Plans

Yesterday the Pentagon made a series of presentations and media events to lay out the initial numbers for future spending. The goal of the Secretary Leon Panetta’s Defense Department is to cut $487 billion in ten years with the current Five Year Defense Plan (FYDP) containing over half the reductions. As part of this DoD released a 15 page document and a one page budget summary that provides top level guidance on the plans.

Many of the planned cut backs are based on the idea that with the disengagement of forces in Iraq and Afghanistan cuts may be made in those areas. This means that money for the “Global War on Terror (GWOT)” or “Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO)” as that support was called will see significant cuts. In FY10 it was $163 billion, in FY11 $159 billion with $115 billion planned for FY12 and only $88 billion in FY13. This adds up to a 54 percent reduction and saves $75 billion in those three years.

Since personnel costs both for the current Active members, their dependents,the reserve force and retirees make up about thirty percent of the defense budget there will be reductions and adjustments to their size and benefits. 100,000 Soldiers and Marines will be eliminated from the active military with the Army losing approximately 8 brigades of troops. Even though the Marine Corps has grown substantially since 9/11 it maintains the same force structure of 3 active divisions and 1 reserve so there will be cuts to the size of individual units and support forces. The Pentagon states that even with these cuts the size of the ground forces will be bigger then on 9/11. There will also be increases in medical costs to the individuals and a commission to revamp military retirement benefits.

The Air Force and Navy will too see reductions in their force structure. The Navy will retire some ships early while delaying the construction of others. This means that it won’t grow as fast as currently planned. The Air Force will lose some tactical aircraft, cut transports and reduce planned buys of some F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Only a few programs are targeted for elimination so far. These include the C-27 Joint Cargo Aircraft used primarily by the Air National Guard. It is planned the C-130 will provide needed capability there. The new Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) which is to replace the Maverick and Hellfire missiles will be scaled back. It was about to select its prime contractor. The Global Hawk Block 30 will finish production and there will be some other nibbling around the edges.

All of this ads up to some significant reduction in business for defense contractors. The JAGM was a large contract that either Raytheon (RTN) or Lockheed Martin (LMT) were hoping to win. The cuts in ship production will affect Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) and General Dynamics (GD). Reduction in JSF will certainly affect Lockheed and its support contractors.

The contractors who provide support in Afghanistan and at bases across the U.S. will see cuts as there are smaller, less troops to support. Logistics needs will also be cut back so those making things like battle armor, uniforms, and small arms will also be affected.

Overall it will will remove about 9% of planned spending in FY13-17 from the defense budget. That will cause some companies severe pain depending on how broad their product line and customer base is.

Of course Congress is the final say and they could easily keep some of the funding for some of the programs cushioning the cuts and blows to the defense industry. The elections this year will also have a key affect.

A lot more to come as yesterday was just a starting point.

Photo is from U.S. Navy Imagery’s Flickr photostream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Colt May Face World Without M4 Carbine Production

Since the mid-1960′s the United States and many of its allies have been using the M16 and variants as their standard rifle and small arm. Since the start of the Global War on Terror in 2001 the focus has switched to the M4 carbine version of the ubiquitous rifle. This is shorter then the standard M16 and was found more useful in the close encounters that U.S. Soldiers and Marines found themselves facing in Afghanistan and Iraq. The majority of those weapons have been made by Colt but now that may be changing.

Twice in the last twenty years the Army has tried to develop new rifles and both times were not able to proceed into production. The last attempt actually developed a weapon called the XM8 rifle which was made in limited quantities by Heckler & Koch and while the standard infantry weapon was not chosen to replace the M16/M4 the 25mm version has seen limited use in Afghanistan and the Army recently ordered more due to its success.

The M4 has received some criticism for its performance over the last ten years especially in Afghanistan. There have been claims that it jammed easily and did not provide the necessary combat performance. The Special Forces due to some issues went ahead and developed and purchased their own assault weapon, the SCAR. This is a product of FN Herstel and was the winner of a competition for a new rifle firing the standard 5.56mm round as well as a “H” version shooting a 7.62mm one as well.

Now it is being reported that the Army may try a two track approach to fixing some of these issues. First they are exploring having a new competition to develop a different small arm. This would be an open competition against a new set of requirements. It is expected that most of the weapons bid would be existing ones such as the SCAR.

The second track is transferring production of the M4 from Colt to a new company. The Army now owns the data rights to the design and is able to award any company a production contract. This used to be more common in the past but recently in order to save money the Defense Department has not always bought the design or rights to a system. A recent example of such a transfer is the move of the Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) production from BAE Systems (BAE:LSE) to Oshkosh (OSK).

Colt is now facing a similar problem that now confronts BAE: the loss of one of their major products and revenue generators. Colt has reacted to the announced Army plans by ramping up their lobbying efforts to help Congress decide to keep the program with them.

It is an issue faced by many different programs as they reach the end of their lives. Is it cheaper and more effective to keep the existing system in production or better for the Defense Department to develop a new one and transition to a new supplier. One would think that with something as basic as a rifle there would be no need to change. While that is true there have been some incremental improvements in technology that lead to better performance including reliability, damage and rate of fire. The Army may want to look at these.

Certainly there is also a chance, as with the FMTV, where a new supplier might offer the same product at a better price and the Government must explore this option. What does seem sure is that Colt and the other small arms manufacturers across the world are ready for the U.S. to buy a new weapon if they really want one.

Photo from brian.ch’s Flickr photo stream.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

House Begins to Cut Defense Budget

The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) approved by a 60 to 1 vote their version of the 2012 Defense Budget. This is basically similar to what was requested by the Obama Administration and reflects the first real reduction to U.S. defense spending since the attacks of 9/11.

As in previous budgets it was split into three parts: first, the base budget which funds the U.S. military and its investment, production, training and support activities; second, the cost of “Overseas Contingency Operations” (OCO) which used to be called the Global War on Terror (GWOT) which are the costs associated with operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and finally it also includes money for the Department of Energy (DOE) support to the U.S. military which is primarily related to nuclear weapons.

The base budget was about $535 billion which was a slight increase on the $533.8 billion programmed in 2010 for such activities. Due to the fact that no 2011 budget was officially passed by Congress until late in the year the Department of Defense relied on continuing resolution which restricted spending to 2010 levels. When the final budget deal was struck funding the rest of the year total planned spending remained consistent with 2010 levels. The Obama Administration had requested $548 billion with almost $160 billion for OCO. This amount was not approved or provided.

The HASC bill approved amounts to a reduction as the OCO funding was reduced to only $119 billion from the $130 billion in 2010 and the $160 billion proposed in 2011. Total spending in 2012 based on the HASC will be $690 billion including the DOE funding of $18 billion. This is a net increase over 2010 but almost $20 billion less then the planned spending in 2011.

What does this all mean for defense contractors? If the House totals hold, and after the work with the Appropriations Committee and the Senate there may be many changes in what the money is spent on, it will be the first net reduction in U.S. defense spending in 10 years. This will mean that some contracts won’t get funded and some companies will see their revenue and earnings reduced.

The cuts to OCO mean those companies heavily involved in providing support and equipment for Iraq and Afghanistan will see the first cuts. The Army’s LOGCAP IV contract provides much of this support for deployed forces and companies like DynCorp International, Fluor and KBR have received large contracts as part of it. The reduction to OCO may affect LOGCAP and those companies involved in it.

It will also mean less bullets, beans and gas will be bought to support the troops in Iraq especially. Suppliers of basic items may see reductions in the amount of items purchased from them. This includes ATK who make ammunition as well as the various gasoline refiners and providers. As the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan winds down the DoD will be concentrating on making new weapon systems and repairing and refitting the equipment used by the military in those operations.

If and when all of the U.S. and Allied forces return from the fight there will be no need for OCO funding at all. This seems to indicate that the base U.S. defense budget will sink to about $500 – $600 billion a year. This will provide opportunities for those companies providing new, advanced weapons as well as supporting the U.S. military in its bases in the U.S., Asia and Europe. The next round of cuts though will be to this base budget. That will affect the entire U.S. defense industry and may lead to reductions in the number of contractors either through M&A or just moving to other business lines.

Defense spending has been a major prop to the U.S. economy as a whole as it supports businesses and jobs across all of the states. If the civil market has not recovered sufficiently cuts to this money will have a negative effect on many local economies across the U.S. already being experienced as some contracts are eliminated or reduced.
This HASC vote may be the first step into a period like the Nineties which saw wholesale changes to the U.S. defense industry and the countries’ industrial base as a whole.

Photo from David Paul Ohmer’s Flickr Photostream.

Article first published as House Begins to Cut Defense Budget on Technorati.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

U.S. Lets Contracts To Clean Up Overseas Bases Tetra Tech To Benefit

January 17, 2010 by · Comment
Filed under: BNET 

The United States military over the last nine years has established and operated large bases in Afghanistan and Iraq. The Global War on Terror…

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Army buys a lot of Hellfires

The US Army awarded Lockheed Martin a contract to produce Hellfire missiles. These are normally fired from AH-64 and OH-58D helicopters and some Air Force aircraft. The missile is used by the US and its Allies. In Iraq and Afghanistan the Army has been using these with great effect to strike a variety of targets. The contract is valued at over $350 M and will purchase 1400 missiles. It is estimated that over 6000 have been used to date in the Global War on Terror.

For more see the Orlando Sentinal.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

>