Boeing workers want strike, union postpones

The Boeing machinists voted to strike effective Wednesday night, but the leaders of the Union have given Boeing 48 more hours to come to an agreement. The strike will start tonight if no deal is reached. The leadership decision was controversial and not well received by the members who had voted overwhelmingly to strike. Any extended strike, as Sikorsky illustrated in 2006, will be very disruptive to the delivery schedules for all Boeing problems. It is especially key now as Boeing is expected to turn in their new proposal for the KC-45 soon.

See the St Louis Business Journal for some more information.

Air Mobility Command General pessimistic on tanker

Gen Lichte, the commander of AMC, expressed concern with the pace of the KC-45 recompete. He is concerned that not only will there be further delays in the award, but that the loser will then protest the recompete. DoD, taking over the competition from the Air Force, had originally planned for proposal submission in August. At Boeing’s request they have delayed this until 1 October, with a goal of awarding the contract by the end of Calendar Year 2008. Boeing is asking for more time, claiming that the requirements may drive them to bid a different aircraft then the B767 previously proposed. EADS and Northrop Grumman will most likely use a proposal that is mostly like the one that won last time. They even had the first KC-45 under construction.

Business Week has an article here.

Union and Boeing try to agree

Boeing is negotiating with the machinists union who make up the core of its workforce on both military and commercial aircraft. Today they sent their best and last offer. This includes the employees who will build the tanker for the US Air Force. So in the middle of trying to write and cost a proposal to the Air Force for a program that is seen as key to the company holding onto a market they are trying to prevent work stoppages. Strikes are the kind of thing that can kill a program’s schedule.

See Excite News for more.

Update: The union leaders have recommended rejection of the Boeing proposal and striking on 4 September. While this will have a large effect on civil aircraft production it won’t help Boeing get ready for the KC-45 if they win again.

See Bloomberg.com for a story on this mess.

Former Undersecretary of Acquisition criticizes Boeing

The former Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics was quoted in a newspaper article criticizing Boeing for wanting a delay in submitting their proposal for the KC-45 recompete. Jacques Gansler who worked in the second Clinton administration said that because of the critical need for the new aircraft if Boeing cannot support the schedule, perhaps they should just not bid. He feels that it would not be proper for the government to give the delay in this situation.

For more see The Guardian.

Army to buy more CH-47 aircraft

The Army awarded Boeing a 5 year contract for CH-47F cargo helicopters. The number procured is 181 with 10 options. There will also likely be some FMS sales from this contract. The CH-47F is the latest variant of the helicopter with sophisticated avionics and improved capabilities. 48 have been built to date. The CH-47F is one of the programs that was birthed from the Comanche termination. The others being the UH-60M, UH-72A and the JCA fixed wing aircraft. The CH-47F is especially effective in Afghanistan due to its high altitude and temperature capabilities.

To see the press release go to the Wall Street Journal’s MarketWatch here.

Representative Asks For Tanker Bid Delay

U.S. Rep. Joseph D. Courtney, from Connecticut, has written to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to ask him to delay the renewed bidding for the $35 billion aerial refueling tanker contract. “It is important to get this decision right,” Courtney said, because it is “one of the most critical components of our national security.” Courtney is particularly concerned that there be adequate time for the RFP “to be vetted by the competitors and evaluated by Congress.”

The Pentagon is committed to a quick timetable, but Courtney argues that such an “unnecessarily aggressive timeline for a final decision, will once again tilt the outcome” in favor of EADS. Courtney is very interested in the process, because the Boeing tanker’s engines would be made by East Hartford-based Pratt & Whitney.

More details on Courtney’s letter can be found at Hartford Business.

Boeing and KC-45 in turmoil

After meeting with DoD and the US Air Force to discuss the new tanker RFP due to the GAO upholding their protest, Boeing is now saying that without significantly more time to prepare a proposal they may have to drop out. The new schedule is for the Boeing and Northrop Grumman teams to submit by the end of October with a decision before the new calendar year. Boeing is saying that they may need to bid a larger aircraft then the KC-767 proposed last time due to the fuel capacity and range requirements. A variant of the 777 would have to be used. Boeing supposedly is asking for a more then 180 day delay in the submissions. EADS and Northrop Grumman will most likely submit a tweaked version of their original winning proposal.

For more see The Wichita Business Journal and WashingtonPost.com.

US Air Force to award CSAR-X recompete soon

In a contract that has fallen to the back burner recently due to KC-45 events, the Air Force announced that they would complete the recompete for the CSAR-X by September. Contract award would be soon after. The CSAR-X contract to replace the HH-60 PaveHawk aircraft was originally awarded to Boeing with a variant of the CH-47. Sikorsky and Lockheed Martin protested and won with the GAO ruling that the Air Force did not apply the selection criteria properly. The whole contract was recompeted with Boeing, Sikorsky and Lockheed resubmitting bids.

For more see this article at www.pressconnects.com for the Binghamton area.

Europeon view of KC-45

This article in the Deutsche Welle provides a good round up of the current on goings of the KC-45 recompete. It reiterates that despite rumors on not participating in this round Boeing went ahead and had their meeting with OSD and the Air Force to discuss the RFP. Obviously there is a great deal of interest in Germany, and Europe as a whole, for EADS to win the contract. It would be the largest to date for a primarily European based company.

Boeing moves forward with KC-45

Despite reports earlier in the week, it seems that Boeing will pursue the KC-45 re-proposal. See a story here. The two possible contenders met with US Air Force and DoD representatives to talk through the new RFP. The goal of OSD is to award a contract by the end of the year. The tanker replacement process started 7 years ago with the new delays a KC-145 replacement may not be available until 2012-2014.

Boeing may refuse to bid on KC-45 recompete

Rumors are swirling that Boeing may not bid on the new contract for the KC-45. See an article here. Supposedly Boeing is piqued that the new requirements supposedly favor Northrop Grumman and EADS and will not submit a bid. If there is only one bid it may require the whole process to start over again, of course if DoD and the Air Force change the requirements EADS could claim the same thing and the whole program will get stuck. Unfortunately DoD and the Air Force have to do the new process as GAO upheld the Boeing protest. More to come on this very complicated story.

Six bids for India’s new advanced fighter

With the decision here to relax the off set provisions required for work on Indian defense contracts India received six new proposals for their new advanced fighter aircraft, the MMRCA. See a story here. Boeing, Lockheed Martin, EADS, MiG, SAAB and D’Assault submitted proposals. Aircraft from these companies are currently under evaluation with a decision to be made in the next several months.

House marks appropriations bill

The House Appropriations Committee marked the FY09 budget before taking their August recess.  See a story here. The Army’s struggling Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter (ARH) program was marked to delete 13 aircraft, and the Navy’s Presidential Helo was also decremented. The House also ordered that consideration of jobs would be a criteria for the source selection of the KC-45 tanker. Boeing won its protest of the award to Northrop-Grumman and EADS and forced DoD to reconsider the contract. The Senate needs to also mark the bill and then there will be a Conference mark up as well.

DoD utilizes bankrupt Iridium satellites

Boeing won a contract to develop the bankrupt Iridium communication satellites for DoD. See an article here. Iridium is a network of low earth orbit satellites that were to be used to provide telephonic communication. Motorola had led the original consortium that put the satellites in orbit, but they company went bankrupt. The Navy Research Lab awarded Boeing a contract to exploit the Iridium satellites to support the GPS network already deployed. DoD has been using the satellites for communications purposes, along with commercial customers.

Boeing pays premium for unmanned aircraft partner

Boeing had been working with Insitu, a Washington state company, on unmanned aircraft. Now it just bought the company. See an article here. Based on reports, Boeing payed quite a premium for the company. Insitu had an estimated earnings last year of $80 M and Boeing reportedly payed five times that for the company. Of course all this is based on anonymous reports as the details have not been made public yet. So if you were able to invest money in Insitu you made it back.

Picture by pfala

Boeing Indian contract cancelled due end-user agreements

India canceled a contract with Boeing for P-8 maritime patrol aircraft due to disagreements over end-user limits on the US technology involved. See an article here. The $2.2 B contract was ready to go for final approval when talks broke down over how to review equipment to prevent technology transfer. India objected to the harsh provisions. This does not mean that the contract could not be renegotiated, but it may be India turns to another provider.

C-17 FMS buy

Boeing will continue the C-17 production line for a few more years. See a press release here. No details of how many aircraft or contract value were provided. Boeing is on contract for 190 C-17s for the USAF, of which 175 have been delivered. 15 more were just placed on contract as part of the FY08 Defense Supplemental bill. Boeing had been seeing the end of the production line with the finishing of USAF and foreign orders. Depending on the size of the Qatar order it may extend the line for some time.

DoD and USAF agree to recompete KC-45 contract

In light of the GAO report the USAF and DoD decided to recompete the new tanker contract. See an article here. This, like the CSAR-X, means that a whole new competition will be held. The Air Force will rewrite the RFP and Boeing and Northrop Grumman will resubmit proposals. Much of the work preparing these will be already done which will speed up the process for the bidders.

KC-45 protest summary report released

The GAO released a summary of why they upheld the protest by Boeing over the KC-45 award. See an article here. The chief reason was due to the Air Force’s failure to properly apply the criteria for source selection. Of the several reasons listed two ones that stand out is that they gave EADS credit for exceeding a requirement when they should not have, and rather than just noting the risk associated with the Boeing bid the Air Force calculated a dollar figure to overcome that risk. This alone drove up the cost proposal of the Boeing K-767 aircraft. The Air Force technically still does not have to withdraw the award to Northrop Grumman and EADS, but they would be best off reopening the competition.

Seattle Times’ Analysis of Boeing Contract Win

In this article entitled Boeing Wins Tanker Protest, But Drama Is Far From Over, the Seattle Times states:

The saga of the Air Force refueling tanker contract is not over by a long shot, though Boeing won a huge victory Wednesday when the Government Accountability Office (GAO) comprehensively backed the company’s protest of the initial contract award.

Read the original article here.

C-5 upgrade contract spills over

Goodrich announced that they received a subcontract from Lockheed Martin to provide engine pylons and casings for the C-5 Upgrade Program. See a press release here. The contract is worth $600 M and indicates the size of the total program. As the US is now dependent on a fleet of C-5 and C-17 aircraft continued extension of the life of the C-5 is critical to supporting combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Boeing’s protest sustained by the GAO

The GAO ruled today in Boeing’s favor on the KC-45 protest.  They decided that the Air Force failed to properly apply its source selection criteria and did not calculate some of Boeing’s costs correctly.  See a story here.  The GAO recommended that the competition be reopened.  This is what happened with the CSAR-X contract, ironically enough won by Boeing but now back in source selection.  The Air Force is not required to follow the GAO’s recommendation, but if it does not Boeing is sure to go to the Court of Appeals and Congress could make it very difficult for the Air Force to execute the contract.

Boeing slips Australian AEW aircraft

Boeing has been building a modified B737 aircraft to act as an Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) aircraft. Delivery of the first has now slipped four months according to this report. Any issues Boeing has with these types of contract only serves to reinforce the US Air Force’s belief that they could not meet the KC-45 timeline as well as Northrop-Grumman and EADS will. The contract is a fixed price one so a delay will eat into Boeing’s profits as well. The company is also building a similar aircraft for Turkey.

GAO to decide KC-45 protest soon

This article is a good summary of the KC-45 contract. The GAO is supposed to rule on Boeing’s protest within the next two weeks. One would have to bet that they will disallow the protest. There is a chance though, that somehow the Air Force screwed up in how they applied the criteria. Then the process would be reopened again, like the CSAR-X. The article also raises the issue of the US Presidential election. John McCain was the key person that got Boeing in trouble over the attempted lease deal five years ago, and Senator Obama represents the state where Boeing now has its headquarters. Congress has also held off weighing in while the protest wound its course. It is best to think that this is not over yet.

Air Force leadership canned

The Secretary of the Air Force and its Chief of Staff both resigned today. See the story here. The most obvious reason was the completion of an independent review of how the USAF was handling it’s nuclear weapons. Badly was the conclusion since Minuteman fuzes were shipped to Taiwan and a B-52 flew across the country with nukes on board without the crew’s knowledge. Other issues were the problems and favoritism related to Thunderbird contracts as discussed here. On top of the fairly recent scandal with Boeing and the tanker lease it is a dark day for the service.

Next Page »

• Archives

  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007

• Browse By Topic

  • AAI Corporation
  • AAR Corporation
  • ABB Bomem
  • Ace Electronics
  • Acquisitions
  • Adams Brothers
  • Aecom Technology
  • AeroVironment
  • afghanistan
  • Agility DGS
  • Airbus
  • Akimeka Technologies
  • Alabama
  • Alliant Lake
  • Alliant Techsystems
  • Allied Defense Group
  • Allison Transmission
  • Alphaport
  • AM General
  • AmeriQual
  • Archer Western Contractors
  • Argon ST
  • Arizona
  • Armstrong Tools
  • augusta westland
  • Austal
  • Australia
  • Avineon
  • Axiom Resource Management
  • BAE Systems
  • Battelle Memorial Institute
  • Bayview Edison Industries
  • BBN Technologies
  • Bearing Point
  • Belgium
  • Bell
  • BL Harbert International
  • BMMI
  • Boeing
  • BRAC
  • Brush Wellman
  • Bulgaria
  • Business Line
  • Butt Construction
  • BVR Systems
  • CACI
  • CAE
  • Canada
  • Careers
  • Carmanah Technologies
  • CEi
  • Ceradyne
  • Chemring
  • Citigroup
  • Cleveland BioLabs
  • Cobham Defense Electronic Systems
  • Colt
  • CombiMatrix
  • Commentary
  • commercial aviation
  • Concurrent Technologies
  • Congress
  • Connecticut
  • Contingency Management Group
  • Contract Additions
  • Contract Awards
  • Cray
  • crime
  • CSC
  • Cubic
  • Czech Republic
  • D'Assault
  • DARPA
  • DB Control
  • Denmark
  • Department of Defense
  • development program
  • Digital Fusion
  • DISA
  • DLA
  • DRS Technologies
  • Ducommun
  • Dynamic Flowform
  • Dyncorp
  • DZSP 21
  • EADS
  • Earnings
  • Eaton
  • Editorial
  • EFW Inc.
  • EG&G
  • EnergySolutions
  • England
  • Events
  • Express Scripts
  • Fairway Medical Technologies
  • Federal Budget Process
  • Finemeccanica
  • FLIR
  • Florida
  • FMS
  • Force Protection
  • Ford
  • France
  • GAO
  • GE
  • General Atomics