<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: India changes offset reqirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2008/08/03/india-changes-offset-reqirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2008/08/03/india-changes-offset-reqirements/</link>
	<description>In-Depth Coverage of the Defense Procurement Industry</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Six bids for India&#8217;s new advanced fighter &#124; Defense Procurement News</title>
		<link>http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/2008/08/03/india-changes-offset-reqirements/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Six bids for India&#8217;s new advanced fighter &#124; Defense Procurement News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defenseprocurementnews.com/?p=2518#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] the decision here to relax the off set provisions required for work on Indian defense contracts India received six [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the decision here to relax the off set provisions required for work on Indian defense contracts India received six [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.601 seconds -->
